Dental implant showdown: zirconia vs. titanium frameworks tested for durability
NCT ID NCT07657364
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This trial compares two types of full-arch dental implant frameworks—one made from a single piece of zirconia and the other from titanium with a zirconia top—in people who have lost all teeth in one or both jaws. The goal is to see which material leads to fewer mechanical problems and better quality of life over a year. Participants receive either framework and are monitored for complications like cracks or loosening.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Monolithic zirconia prosthesis or titanium framework with zirconia superstructure
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that monolithic zirconia frameworks are a durable, less complication-prone option for full-arch dental implants, improving patient quality of life.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage trial with only 12 participants and a 12-month follow-up, so results may not apply broadly. Both materials could show similar complication rates.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 12 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Apr 2026
- Expected to finish
-
May 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 70 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Aged 18 years or older. 2. Able to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent. 3. In good general health, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Class I or II. 4. Completely edentulous in the arch to be treated (maxilla and/or mandible). 5. A candidate for a full-arch, screw-retained implant-supported prosthesis, requiring 4 to 6 implants in the treatment arch. 6. Sufficient bone volume at planned implant sites to place implants of at least 3.5mm in diameter and 8mm in length. 7. Adequate crown height space (15-22 mm) for a fixed prosthesis. 8. A zone of keratinized mucosa at the crest of the ridge measuring at least 2 mm in width. 9. Opposing arch is fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis. 10. Demonstrates acceptable oral hygiene and the motivation to maintain it. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Medical contraindications: * Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c \> 7.0%). * History of radiotherapy in the head and neck region. * History of intravenous bisphosphonate therapy. * Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised status. * Any other uncontrolled systemic disease that constitutes a contraindication for oral surgery. 2. Behavioral Factors: * Heavy smoking, defined as consumption of more than 10 cigarettes per day. * Presence of parafunctional habits (e.g., bruxism, clenching) as diagnosed by clinical examination. 3. Local Oral Factors: * Active, untreated periodontal disease in any remaining dentition. * Presence of acute oral infection or pathology at the intended surgical site. * Crown height space less than 15 mm or more than 22 mm. * Insufficient keratinized mucosa (\< 2 mm width) that cannot be corrected with a simple surgical procedure prior to implant placement. 4. General: * Pregnancy or lactation. * Participation in another interventional clinical trial. * Perceived inability to comply with the study protocol and follow-up schedule.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Complete edentulism are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Faculty of Dentistry - Cairo University
RECRUITINGCairo, 11553, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Dental implant showdown: titanium vs nano-carbon frames
- Which dental framework keeps bacteria at bay?
- Can 3D printing make dentures a better fit?
- A dental showdown: which clip keeps dentures firmly in place?
- Which scan makes implant dentures fit best?
- Can 3D printing precision redefine denture comfort?