Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Tooth crown showdown: zirconia vs. metal for kids

NCT ID NCT05910905

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tested two types of dental crowns for children's back teeth: white zirconia crowns and traditional silver-colored metal crowns. Researchers treated 35 healthy kids aged 6-9 with cavities on multiple tooth surfaces. They checked how well each crown held up and asked parents which they liked better. The goal was to see if the newer zirconia crowns work as well as the standard metal ones.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
prefabricated pediatric zirconia crown and prefabricated stainless steel crown
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that zirconia crowns are a better-looking and equally effective option for restoring decayed baby molars in children.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed study with only 35 children, so results may not apply to all kids. Crowns can still fail due to fractures or new decay.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

35 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jan 2025

Finished

Dec 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

6 to 9 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Healthy children aged 6-9 years with caries on primary molars * Children without systemic disease or developmental dental anomalies that may affect caries susceptibility. * Children whose cooperation is 'positive' or 'absolutely positive' according to the Frankl behavioral scale (Frankl et al., 1962). * Those with deep dentin caries that do not extend to the pulp in the teeth to be treated * The molars will be treated with a crown indication. * Presence of symmetry of the primary molar to be treated in the opposite arch. * The molar to be treated is in occlusion with the antagonist. * Presence of caries on at least two surfaces of the molars to be treated. * Absence of spontaneous pain, abscess, mobility, interradicular lesion in the tooth to be treated * Patients whose parents and themselves agree to participate in the treatment Exclusion Criteria: * Children whose treatment cannot be continued on the dental chair due to cooperation * Molars that will soon be exfoliated, 1/2 of the root has been resorbed * The presence of bruxism * The presence of erosion or attrition-related wear on the opposing molar * The patient does not come to the control appointment or does not want to continue to the research * Have allergy to local anesthetic, nickel or chromium * Complications during treatment.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Carious teeth are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Marmara University

    Istanbul, 34854, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.