Can a vacuum dressing stop infections in high-risk leg fractures?
NCT ID NCT06337292
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tests whether a negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) device, placed over the surgical incision, can reduce infections and other wound complications compared to standard dressings in people with severe leg fractures. The trial will enroll 352 patients with high-risk tibia fractures. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either the NPWT device or a regular dressing, and their recovery is tracked for 3 months.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- incisional negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) device
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could become a standard way to prevent wound infections and complications after high-risk fracture surgery.
- What could go wrong
- This is a mid-stage trial with 352 patients, so results may not apply to everyone. The device may not reduce infections significantly more than standard dressings.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 3
Large-scale testing in a bigger group. Usually the last step before a treatment can be approved.
- Participants
-
About 352 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Jan 2025
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2028
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. All open or closed tibial plateau or pilon fractures treated operatively with internal fixation at high risk for complication. Any open Gustilo Type I, II or IIIA tibial shaft fracture treated definitively with internal or external fixation with or without ipsilateral leg compartment syndrome if at least one wound is primarily closed. 2. We define high-risk fractures as those that are either: * Closed fracture initially treated with an external fixator (with or without limited internal fixation) and treated definitive more than 3 days later after swelling has resolved; * Any open type I, II or IIIA fracture, regardless of timing of definitive treatment; * Any tibial plateau fracture associated with ipsilateral leg compartment syndrome fasciotomy wounds that has at least one wound primarily closed 3. Requiring incision for fixation or debridement of 3 cm or greater. 4. Patients 18 years of age or older Exclusion Criteria: 1. The study injury is already infected at time of study enrollment. 2. Patient is unable to receive incisional NPWT for any reason. 3. Patients who have already had definitive fixation prior to enrollment in the study. 4. Severe problems with maintaining follow-up (e.g., patients who are homeless at the time of injury or those who are intellectually challenged without adequate family support or who are prisoners). 5. The study injury is a Gustilo Type IIIB or IIIC open fracture.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Fracture of tibia are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
6 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
RECRUITINGLebanon, New Hampshire, 03756, United States
-
Inova Fairfax MEdical Campus
RECRUITINGFalls Church, Virginia, 22042, United States
-
UTHealth/McGovern Medical School
RECRUITINGHouston, Texas, 77030, United States
-
University of Maryland R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center
RECRUITINGBaltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
-
University of Maryland Shock Trauma/Capitol Regions
RECRUITINGBaltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
-
Vanderbilt University
RECRUITINGNashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a common bleeding drug prevent wound problems after ankle replacement?
- Can suction therapy heal infected leg wounds faster?
- Can a placental patch help heal stubborn diabetic foot ulcers?
- A simple drain may slash wound infections after gynecologic cancer surgery
- Emergency wound study aims to predict which stitches will fail
- Common surgical dressing may trigger allergic reactions in some joint replacement patients