Can a simple walk reveal hidden clot risks?
NCT ID NCT06418633
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares how a 60-minute treadmill walk changes blood clotting in people who have had a blood clot (venous thromboembolism) and those who haven't. Researchers will measure clotting markers before and after exercise in 94 participants. The goal is to better understand how exercise affects clotting risk in these two groups.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 94 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Feb 2025
- Expected to finish
-
Apr 2030
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 65 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Inclusion criteria common to both groups : * Patients who have given written informed consent. * Patients who are affiliated to or beneficiaries of a social security scheme. Inclusion criteria specific to the Patient Group: * Patients with a personal history of provoked venous thromboembolism, venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism, with the last attack dating back to more than 6 months, and whose clinical phenotype did not justify long-term antithrombotic drug prophylaxis. Definition of provoked venous thromboembolism : The clinical criteria used to classify venous thromboembolism as provoked are : * First year of combined oestrogen-progestogen oral contraception, or contraception using an oestrogen-impregnated vaginal ring or transcutaneous synthetic oestrogen patch. * Hormonal stimulation for oocyte retrieval * Pregnancy and 6 weeks post-partum * Surgery * Trauma * Immobilisation in plaster or splint * Outbreak of acute infectious disease * Acute flare-up of inflammatory disease * Prolonged air travel lasting at least 4 hours * Prolonged strict bed rest lasting at least 3 consecutive days. Inclusion criteria specific to the Control Group: * Subjects with no personal history of venous thromboembolism * Subjects with no family history of venous thromboembolism in first-degree relatives * Subjects of the same sex and age with a tolerance of +/- 5 years in relation to the matched case. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients who are physically unable to perform the 60-minute walking test, for any reason, in particular cardiovascular contraindications to exercise (recent acute coronary syndrome unstable angina, rhythm disorders, tight aortic stenosis, cardiac heart failure, acute myocarditis, pericarditis or endocarditis endocarditis, poorly controlled hypertension, pre-stress blood pressure \> 200/110 mmHg, recent stroke or transient ischemic attack). * Patients on anticoagulant or antithrombotic treatment, ongoing or discontinued within the last month. * Patients treated for pulmonary embolism who remain dyspneic after anticoagulant treatment and requiring a work-up for pulmonary hypertension. * Last surgery dating back to less than 3 months. * Known chronic morbidities: diabetes mellitus, chronic inflammatory or infectious disease, heart failure, renal insufficiency, hepatic insufficiency or arterial thrombosis dating back to less than 3 months. * For women: treatment containing synthetic or natural estrogen, in progress or discontinued for less than a month * Pregnancy within the last year. * Difficult venous access. * Regular practice of an intensive sporting/physical activity, such as running, tennis, cycling etc. of more than 3 hours per week.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Venous thromboembolic disease are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
CHU de Nîmes
RECRUITINGNîmes, Occitanie, 30029, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a phone app stop deadly clots from coming back?
- Can electronic alerts and patient teaching stop deadly clots after cancer surgery?
- Can a new Five-Category system predict which pulmonary embolism patients will crash?
- Can we predict who dies from blood clots? a 100,000-Patient study searches for clues
- Could tailored blood thinner dosing prevent strokes in chinese patients?
- Could a simple aspirin pill replace daily shots to prevent postpartum blood clots?