Foam vs. heat: which works better for varicose veins?

NCT ID NCT05312970

Terminated Symptom relief Sponsor: Boston Scientific Corporation Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Mar 30, 2026 · Last updated May 23, 2026 · Updated 6 times

Summary

This study compared two treatments for varicose veins: Varithena (a foam injection) and Endothermal Ablation (using heat). It involved 43 adults with a faulty great saphenous vein. The goal was to see which treatment better relieved symptoms like pain and heaviness, measured by a symptom questionnaire after 3 months.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for VARICOSE VEINS are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Contacts and locations

Show contact details

Locations

Cardiovascular Institute of the South

Houma, Louisiana, 70360, United States
Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, 10032, United States
Englewood Hospital and Medical Center

Englewood, New Jersey, 07631, United States
Lake Washington Vascular

Bellevue, Washington, 98004, United States
Medstar Georgetown University Hospital

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20057, United States
Stony Brook University Hospital

Stony Brook, New York, 11794, United States
UT Physicians Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Vascular Care Connecticut

Darien, Connecticut, 06820, United States
Vein Healthcare Center

South Portland, Maine, 04106, United States

Conditions

Explore the condition pages connected to this study.

VARICOSE VEINS