Which running plan works best? study tests three intensity strategies
NCT ID NCT07565168
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looked at three different ways to distribute training intensity—polarized, pyramidal, and threshold—in recreational distance runners. Twenty-four runners followed an 8-week program to see which method improved their endurance, running economy, and 5-kilometer time trial performance the most. The goal is to help runners train smarter based on scientific evidence.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could help recreational runners choose the most effective training intensity plan to improve their endurance and race times.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study with only 24 participants, so results may not apply to all runners. It compares training methods, not a treatment, so no major risks are involved.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
24 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Apr 2024
- Finished
-
Apr 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 60 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * age ≥ 18 years; * a habitual training frequency of ≥ 4 sessions·week * running experience ≥ 2 years; * absence of musculoskeletal injuries in the preceding 3 months Exclusion Criteria: * an official 10-km race time \> 40:00 min:s for men and \> 50:00 min:s for women * any cardiometabolic disease
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Aerobic performance are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Cam. del Molino, 5, Fuenlabrada, Madrid
Fuenlabrada, Madrid, 28943, Spain
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a shuttle run shift key blood nutrients? study tests the question
- Can a hard cycling sprint change a Heart-Calming peptide?
- Can exercise type reshape appetite hormones? a trial puts aerobic, anaerobic, and HIIT to the test
- Can lung power predict a wrestler's strength and stamina?
- Can training be timed to a Woman's cycle? a new study investigates
- Can All-Out sprints reshape the Thyroid's response?