Shocking the bladder: TENS vs PTNS for urgency
NCT ID NCT05309993
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Sep 11, 2026 · Updated 4 times
Summary
This study compared two nerve stimulation treatments—TENS (a skin patch) and PTNS (a needle near the ankle)—for women with overactive bladder who had not gotten relief from lifestyle changes or medication. The goal was to see if TENS works as well as PTNS to improve quality of life. However, the trial was stopped early and only enrolled 27 participants, so the findings are limited.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) device and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) device
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that a non-invasive TENS device works as well as the more invasive PTNS for overactive bladder, offering a simpler option.
- What could go wrong
- The trial was terminated early with only 27 participants, so results are very limited. It is a small, early-stage study that may not provide clear answers.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Started
-
Jun 2022
- Finished
-
Aug 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Female participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Female Subjects ≥18 years of age * OAB, UUI or Mixed Urinary Incontinence with urgency predominant symptoms and more bother from UUI than stress urinary incontinence * Failed trial of conservative therapy (including bladder training, fluid modification, diet modification, caffeine restriction, or pelvic floor training) -Failed trial of at least one pharmacologic treatment (anticholinergics, β3- adrenoceptor agonist) either due to inability to take the medication, adverse reaction to medication, or no improvement on medication * Willing to complete study questionnaires * Willing to adhere to 12 office visits for PTNS over 3 months if randomized to that arm * No contraindication to undergoing PTNS or TENS therapy Exclusion Criteria: * Age \< 18 years * Presence of urinary fistula * Male genital anatomy * Undergoing evaluation or treatment of recurrent (2 or more infections in the last 6 months or 3 or more infections in the last 12 months) or current urinary tract infection * Current Bladder stones * Bladder cancer or suspected bladder cancer * Gross Hematuria * Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant during the study * Cognitive impairment * Central or peripheral neurologic disorders such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, spina bifida, spinal cord lesions, etc. * Metal implants such as pacemaker, implantable defibrillator, or metal implants where PTNS or TENS device needs to be placed (ankle/leg) * Uncontrolled diabetes * Diabetes with peripheral nerve involvement * Current use of anticoagulants (excluding aspirin) * Current use of anticholinergics or use within the last 4 weeks * Current use of botox bladder injections or bladder botox injection within the last year (12 months) * Current use of sacral neuromodulation therapy or currently implanted sacral neuromodulation device or leads * Bladder outlet obstruction * Urinary retention or gastric retention * Painful Bladder Syndrome/Interstitial Cystitis * Unable to be contacted for follow up by telephone * Inability to speak/read/understand English or Spanish
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Overactive bladder are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University of New Mexico
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A gentle nerve zap may calm an overactive bladder
- Can nerve stimulation beat education for overactive bladder?
- Sound waves vs. overactive bladder: a new hope?
- Could a simple video calm nerves before a bladder test?
- Can a nerve pacemaker that takes breaks still tame an overactive bladder?
- Diabetes drug class may change how the bladder behaves