Shocking the bladder: TENS vs PTNS for urgency

NCT ID NCT05309993

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compared two nerve stimulation treatments—TENS (a skin patch) and PTNS (a needle near the ankle)—for women with overactive bladder who had not gotten relief from lifestyle changes or medication. The goal was to see if TENS works as well as PTNS to improve quality of life. However, the trial was stopped early and only enrolled 27 participants, so the findings are limited.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) device and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) device
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that a non-invasive TENS device works as well as the more invasive PTNS for overactive bladder, offering a simpler option.
What could go wrong
The trial was terminated early with only 27 participants, so results are very limited. It is a small, early-stage study that may not provide clear answers.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for OVERACTIVE BLADDER are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

overactive bladder Urinary Incontinence, Urge

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • University of New Mexico

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.