Can a phone call replace a Doctor's visit? rural health study tests telemedicine
NCT ID NCT07299201
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tests whether proactive telemedicine (phone or online check-ins) works as well as in-person visits for people in rural areas who haven't seen a doctor in over a year. Researchers will measure how many people start using healthcare again and whether their quality of life changes. The goal is to see if remote care can improve access to preventive health services.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Telemedicine brief behavioural lifestyle intervention
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that remote check-ins are as good as in-person visits for reaching people who haven't seen a doctor in a while, potentially improving access in rural areas.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage trial (120 people) comparing two approaches, not testing a new treatment. Results may not apply to other regions or populations.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
120 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jun 2024
- Expected to finish
-
Mar 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Registered patients of EAP Anoia Rural * Age ≥18 years * No contact with the primary care team within the previous 12 months * Able to provide informed consent (electronic or paper) Exclusion Criteria: * Proxy care (consulted by caregivers without patient present). * Inability to communicate. * Severe cognitive or psychiatric impairment. * Advanced or palliative chronic conditions (MACA: Modelo de Atención Crónica Avanzada - Advanced Chronic Care Model). * Outdated contact information.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Adverse effects are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
EAP Anoia rural. Gerència d'Atenció Primària i a la comunitària Penedès. Institut Català de la Salut. Departament de Salut. Generalitat de Catalunya
Igualada, Barcelona, 08700, Spain
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can WhatsApp alerts tame blood sugar swings in kids with type 1 diabetes?
- Can a text message save lives in a heat wave?
- Heart Disease's hidden toll: study tracks quality of life across mind, body, and spirit
- 150,000 children to be tracked from birth to old age in massive health study
- Can a website help liver cancer patients care for themselves during chemoembolization?
- A 10-Question survey could give brazilian pulmonary hypertension patients a voice in their care