Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Less invasive heart valve replacement may be better for seniors with small valves

NCT ID NCT03383445

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing This study
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two ways to replace a narrowed heart valve in elderly patients (65+) who have a small valve opening. One method is less invasive (TAVR, through a tube in an artery), the other is open-heart surgery. The goal is to see which approach gives better blood flow and fewer complications like stroke or bleeding. About 300 participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two procedures.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR)
What this could lead to
If TAVR proves better, it could become the preferred, less invasive option for elderly patients with small aortic valves, reducing complications and improving heart function.
What could go wrong
This is a mid-stage trial with 300 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. Both procedures carry risks like bleeding, stroke, or valve mismatch.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 300 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Aug 2017

Expected to finish

May 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

65 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients ≥65 years-old diagnosed with severe AS (defined as: jet velocity ≥ 4.0 m/s or mean gradient ≥ 40 mmHg or velocity ratio \<0.25 AND aortic valve area ≤ 1.0 cm2 or aortic valve area index ≤ 0.6 cm2/m2; OR mean gradient \>30 mmHg AND aortic valve area ≤ 1.0 cm2 or aortic valve area index ≤ 0.6 cm2/m2 AND \>1200 Agatston units for women or \>2000 Agatston units for men as determined by non-contrast CT). * Small aortic annulus defined as a mean aortic annulus diameters ˂23 mm and a minimal aortic annulus diameter of ≤21.5 mm as measured by 3D-computed tomography (CT) and/or 3D-transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Exclusion Criteria: * Prohibitive surgical risk as determined by the Heart Team * Porcelain aorta * Aortic root dilatation \>45 mm * Coronary artery disease (CAD) not treatable by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), or SYNTAX score \>32 (in the absence of prior revascularization) or severe left main disease * Non-calcific aortic stenosis * Severe mitral regurgitation * Moderate-to-severe tricuspid regurgitation requiring surgical repair * Prior surgical valve in aortic position

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Aortic regurgitation are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • IUCPQ

    Québec, Quebec, G1V 4G5, Canada

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.