Wrist vs groin: which is safer for heart valve procedures?
NCT ID NCT06284837
Summary
This study aims to find out if using an artery in the wrist (radial access) is better than using one in the groin (femoral access) for the secondary imaging tube needed during a TAVI heart valve replacement. Researchers will compare the two methods in 542 patients to see which one leads to fewer bleeding problems and blood vessel complications. The goal is to make this common procedure safer by reducing side effects from the access sites.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for VALVE STENOSES, AORTIC are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Study contacts
-
Contact
Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Locations
-
Alfred Health
RECRUITINGMelbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
Contact
Contact
Contact Email: •••••@•••••
-
Cabrini Health
RECRUITINGMelbourne, Victoria, 3144, Australia
Contact
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
-
Epworth Healthcare
RECRUITINGMelbourne, Victoria, 3121, Australia
Contact
Contact Email: •••••@•••••
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.