Which surgery is safer for a burst colon? new study compares options
NCT ID NCT00692393
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two surgical methods for treating a burst section of the colon caused by diverticulitis, a condition that leads to severe abdominal infection. 102 adults with this infection were randomly assigned to either a traditional two-step surgery (Hartmann procedure) or a one-step surgery with a temporary protective stoma. The main goal was to see which approach led to fewer deaths and complications.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- surgical procedure (Hartmann procedure or primary anastomosis with diverting stoma)
- What this could lead to
- If one method proves safer, it could become the preferred surgical approach for this serious condition, reducing deaths and complications.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with only 102 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. Both surgeries carry risks like infection or need for a second operation.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
102 people
The number who actually took part.
- Start date
-
Jun 2008
- Finished
-
Nov 2013
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patient with peritonitis du to sigmoid diverticulum complication * Surgeon - anesthetist confirming the 2 surgeries can be performed Exclusion Criteria: * Physical state which can not permit patient to participate * contraindication to surgery * non-diverticulum peritonitis
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Perforated diverticulitis (hinchey stage III and IV) are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
CHU - Rouen
Rouen, 76031, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- New study aims to take the guesswork out of emergency diverticulitis surgery
- Speed test: new PCR method outruns standard lab for abdominal infections
- Closing wounds later may cut infection risk after belly surgery
- 2500 patient records analyzed to find best treatment for belly emergencies
- Vacuum dressing may cut infection risk after emergency abdominal surgery
- How do antifungals behave in septic shock? small study aims to find out