Less invasive back surgery may be as effective as major revision for spinal stenosis
NCT ID NCT07661199
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This trial compares two surgical approaches for people who develop spinal stenosis near a previous lumbar fusion. One group receives a smaller surgery (microdecompression alone), while the other gets the standard larger surgery (decompression plus extending the fusion). The study measures disability, pain, complications, and reoperation rates over two years to see if the less invasive option works just as well.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Microsurgical decompression with or without fusion extension
- What this could lead to
- If microdecompression alone works as well as the more invasive surgery, patients could avoid a larger operation with fewer risks and faster recovery.
- What could go wrong
- This is a single trial, and results may not apply to all patients. The less invasive surgery might lead to more reoperations or worse long-term outcomes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 338 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Oct 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Mar 2031
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥18 years. * Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) between 30% and 80% at screening. * Symptomatic adjacent segment stenosis following degenerative lumbar fusion surgery. * Persistent symptoms despite at least 6 weeks of appropriate conservative treatment. * Radiological evidence of adjacent segment spinal stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). * Ability to understand the study procedures and complete patient-reported outcome questionnaires. * Ability to provide written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Adjacent segment kyphosis or scoliosis greater than 10 degrees. * Screw loosening or pseudarthrosis of the previous fusion construct. * Known current pregnancy or breastfeeding. * Acute traumatic spinal injury or fracture. * Active inflammatory disease of the spine. * Active neoplastic disease of the spine. * Contraindication to spinal surgery. * Inability to provide informed consent or complete study questionnaires. * Symptoms attributable to spinal stenosis are not the predominant clinical complaint * Foraminal stenosis grade ≥2 according to the Lee classification. * Dynamic spondylolisthesis ≥3 mm on flexion-extension radiographs. * Persons involuntarily detained by judicial or administrative order.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Adjacent segment disease are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, State of Berlin, 10117, Germany
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Teaching the brain about pain before surgery may ease recovery
- Could a nasal spray shield aging brains from Post-Surgery confusion?
- Could a common hand condition reveal hidden heart disease? new imaging trial investigates
- Belly fat vs. body mass index: which better predicts spine surgery risks?
- Simple tube after spine surgery may cut complications
- New nerve block technique aims to cut opioid use after back surgery