Smaller tube, same stone removal: new kidney stone surgery tested
NCT ID NCT05088213
First seen Jun 30, 2026 · Last updated Jul 01, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial compares two surgical techniques for removing kidney stones that are 2 to 4 centimeters in size. The newer method, called suction mini-PCNL, uses a smaller tube and suction to remove stone fragments, while the standard method uses a larger tube. The goal is to see if the newer method works just as well at clearing stones while causing fewer complications like bleeding and infection. The study involves 960 adults aged 18 to 70 across multiple international centers.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- suction mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) procedure
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could offer a safer, less invasive surgical option for removing medium-to-large kidney stones, with less bleeding and shorter hospital stays.
- What could go wrong
- This is a noninferiority trial, meaning it aims to show the new method is not worse than the standard. It may still have higher infection risk or longer surgery time.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
960 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Dec 2021
- Finished
-
Dec 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 70 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adults aged 18-70 years. 2. American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score of 1-2. 3. Kidney stones measuring 2-4 cm in diameter on non-contrast computer tomography. 4. Ability to provide written informed consent and adhere to trial requirements. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Anatomy abnormalities, such as urinary diversion, horseshoe kidney, transplanted kidney, or ureteropelvic junction obstruction. 2. Untreated acute urinary tract infection (UTI). 3. Patients on anticoagulant/antithrombotic therapy, or with uncorrected coagulopathies. 4. Patients who decline trial enrolment or cannot adhere to trial requirements.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Kidney calculi are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Department of Urology, Minimally invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510230, China
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Kidney stone surgery without a hospital stay: can it be done safely?
- Can a tiny scope and laser spare children from major kidney stone surgery?
- Could the type of anesthesia make surgery easier for the surgeon?
- Can medical glue replace the drainage tube in kidney stone surgery?
- X-ray-free kidney stone surgery put to the test in 500-patient trial
- A shot of bupivacaine at the surgical site may ease pain after kidney stone surgery — a trial puts it to the test