Which spine pain care model saves money and improves outcomes?
NCT ID NCT03083886
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026
Summary
This completed study compared three approaches to treating recent back or neck pain: usual care from a primary care provider, usual care plus a coordinated decision-making model (ICE), and usual care plus individualized postural therapy (IPT). Over 3,000 adults with spine pain for less than three months took part. The goal was to see which model leads to lower healthcare costs and better pain and function after one year.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Care model (ICE decision-making or Individualized Postural Therapy) plus usual primary care
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show which care model is most cost-effective and helpful for acute spine pain, guiding doctors toward better, cheaper care.
- What could go wrong
- This is a completed pragmatic trial comparing care models, not a new drug or treatment. Results may not apply to all patients or settings.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
3,087 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jun 2017
- Finished
-
Jun 2021
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with back or neck pain of ≤ 3 months' duration. All patients must have spine pain with or without radiation to the extremities or the head * Age ≥ 18 years * Willing and able to provide informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with symptoms attributed to the spine but without actual pain in the spine (e.g. those with cervicogenic headache without neck pain) * Currently pregnant * Currently receiving disability benefits, worker's compensation, or involved in litigation for a workplace injury * Currently enrolled in another intervention trial for the management of acute back or neck pain * Cancer that is metastatic or being actively treated. (i.e chemotherapy, radiation, surgery) * History of receiving active therapy for back or neck pain in the past 3 months (7+ consecutive days of narcotic use, 6+ sessions of PT, chiropractic care, acupuncture, postural therapy, or other spine therapy delivered by a trained provider) * History of spine surgery or spine injections/ablation in the past 6 months * Severe, active psychosis or major depression inhibiting ability to physically participate in intervention * Red Flag Symptoms (fever, night sweats, unintentional weight loss, bowel or bladder dysfunction, neurologic weakness, history of intravenous drug use)
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Back pain are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Augusto Focil, MD
Oxnard, California, 93030, United States
-
Bernadette U. Iguh, MD
Houston, Texas, 77051, United States
-
Carlos R. Herrera, MD
Houston, Texas, 77013, United States
-
HonorHealth Medical Group
Phoenix, Arizona, 85255, United States
-
Luis Zepeda, MD
Houston, Texas, 77017, United States
-
Marwan A. Edris, MD
Laguna Hills, California, 92653, United States
-
Teresa S. Sligh, MD
North Hollywood, California, 91606, United States
-
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can yoga ease back pain when recovery looks unlikely?
- Can a 13-Minute eye exercise routine ease screen strain?
- Can a Screen-Guided neck workout retrain muscles to ease chronic pain?
- Can a Longer-Lasting nerve block cut opioid use after spine surgery?
- Which neck therapy works better? a Head-to-Head test
- Can diaphragm exercises ease stubborn neck pain?