Tiny gold seeds could sharpen radiation for spine tumors
NCT ID NCT01624220
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested whether implanting tiny gold markers near spinal tumors helps deliver radiation more accurately. Researchers also checked if giving slightly more radiation to the nearby esophagus is safe, which might improve tumor control. The study involved 41 adults with various cancers that had spread to the spine.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- radiation therapy (spinal SBRT) with gold seed implants
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could lead to more precise radiation delivery for spinal tumors, potentially improving tumor control while keeping side effects manageable.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-phase study with only 41 participants, so results may not apply broadly. Higher radiation doses to the esophagus carry risks like inflammation or injury.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
41 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Aug 2012
- Finished
-
Apr 2023
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. STAGE 1: \>/= 18 years old 2. STAGE 1: Pathologically confirmed diagnosis of cancer, including, but not limited to non-small cell lung cancer, breast, prostate, renal cell, melanoma, gastrointestinal, sarcoma, thyroid, head and neck primary, and carcinoma of unknown primary 3. STAGE 1: Signed informed consent 4. STAGE 2: 1-3 above, and Patients undergoing single fraction spinal SBRT Exclusion Criteria: 1. STAGE 1: Patient with radiosensitive histologies (lymphoma, multiple myeloma, small cell carcinomas, germ cell tumors) 2. STAGE 1: Extensive (\> 50%) height loss of the involved vertebral body 3. STAGE 1: Inability to tolerate lying flat on treatment table for greater than 30 minutes 4. STAGE 1: Pregnancy 5. STAGE 2: Prior irradiation of the spine site and level to be treated 6. STAGE 2: Patients with primary disease arising in the posterior elements of the VB in question 7. STAGE 2: History of Barrett's esophagus, esophageal webbing, stricture, or fistula 8. STAGE 2: Prior radiation to the esophagus
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Spinal tumor are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could everyday heart drugs shield cancer patients from Radiation's cardiac toll?
- New hope for young brain cancer patients: targeted drug combo enters phase 2 trial
- Spine surgery infection breakthrough? vancomycin powder tested in new trial
- Radiation after spine surgery: does it help?
- New neck implant under study: will it ease pain and improve lives?
- Spine surgery showdown: robot vs. human hand – which is safer?