Could a cotton swab replace the metal speculum for eye injections?
NCT ID NCT07481500
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Sep 09, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study tests if using a cotton-tipped applicator to hold the eyelid open during eye injections is less painful and faster than the standard metal speculum. About 120 adults with certain eye conditions will take part. The goal is to improve comfort and satisfaction without compromising safety.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 120 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Oct 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Aug 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age 18 years or older 2. Diagnosed with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), or retinal vein occlusion (RVO) 3. Scheduled for intravitreal anti-VEGF injection (bevacizumab, aflibercept, or faricimab) 4. Able to provide written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: 1. Active ocular infection or inflammation 2. Known allergy to povidone-iodine, tetracaine, or levofloxacin 3. Inability to cooperate with the injection procedure 4. Concurrent participation in another interventional clinical trial 5. Anatomical eyelid abnormality precluding use of either retraction technique
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Diabetic macular edema are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- The 20-Minute squeeze: how eye injections push pressure up
- Could years of eye injections weigh down the upper eyelid?
- Eye implant takes aim at diabetic macular edema
- One eye injection, four targets: GenSci148 tested against retinal swelling
- Can a new eye injection beat the standard for wet AMD?
- Can a single gene therapy injection ease diabetic macular edema?