Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Which scan is best for foot arthritis? new study aims to find out

NCT ID NCT05912153

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares SPECT-CT and MRI scans to see which is better at diagnosing symptomatic osteoarthritis in the ankle, hindfoot, and midfoot. Researchers will enroll 132 adults with suspected foot arthritis and measure each scan's accuracy. The goal is to determine the most reliable imaging method to guide treatment decisions.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this could help doctors choose the most accurate imaging test for foot and ankle osteoarthritis, improving diagnosis and treatment planning.
What could go wrong
This is a relatively small, single-center study comparing two imaging methods. Results may not apply to all patients or settings, and neither test is a treatment.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

About 132 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Jul 2023

Expected to finish

Dec 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

Eligible patients subjects will be all patients referred to the Martini Hospital Groningen with suspected OA of the foot and ankle meeting our inclusion criteria. In total 369 patients will be included. A sample of two months showed that 68 new eligible patients were presented at the outpatient clinic with a prevelence of OA in 85%. We assume that at least 50% of the eligible patients are willing to participate in this study, so it is expected that within 24-30 months all patients can be recruited.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Suspected symptomatic ankle, hind- or midfoot OA * Informed consent * Age ≥ 18 years * Average NRS ≥4 over the past week. Exclusion Criteria: * Contraindication for surgery * Contraindication for SPECT-CT or MRI * Contraindication for intra-articular injections * Isolated forefoot pathology * Fracture, ligamentous or tendon injury of the ankle, hind- and/or midfoot trauma within one year before presentation * History of neurological disease * History of foot and/or ankle surgery (affected side) * Inability to read and understand the written information

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Osteoarthritis are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Martini Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Groningen, 9728 NT, Netherlands

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.