Glue vs staples: which closes cancer surgery wounds better?
NCT ID NCT06549803
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two ways to close skin after colorectal cancer surgery: a tissue adhesive (skin bond) and traditional skin stapling. Researchers looked at wound infection rates within 30 days, pain, and cost in 304 patients. The goal was to see if skin bond leads to fewer infections and is more cost-effective.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (skin bond tissue adhesive)
- What this could lead to
- If skin bond works better, it could reduce wound infections and lower costs for colorectal cancer surgery patients.
- What could go wrong
- This is a completed study, but it only compares two closure methods—it does not test a new treatment for cancer itself. Results may not apply to all patients or surgeries.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
304 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Mar 2022
- Finished
-
Dec 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
19 to 80 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * underwent elective colorectal surgery * aged 19 to 80 years * ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score: 1, 2 * surgical approach such as laparoscopic or Robotic Xi platform Exclusion Criteria: * ASA score above 3 * Aged over 80 years * underwent combined surgery for other organ resection * uncontrolled DM
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Colorectal cancer are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Seoul St.Mary's hospital, the Catholic university of Korea
Seoul, Seocho, 06591, South Korea
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Gut bacteria may hold clues to why some cancer treatments work better
- Burning the edges: a new way to stop colon polyps from coming back
- Missed Follow-Up colonoscopies: do they raise the risk of advanced growths?
- A 2.2 mm scope could spot cancerous tissue in minutes, not days
- The gatekeepers of tumors: scientists probe how blood vessels let immune cells in
- New Antibody-Drug conjugate put to the test against Hard-to-Treat cancers