Learning from mistakes: could flawed practice make better surgeons?
NCT ID NCT06729372
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study tested whether deliberately making errors during simulation-based training helps medical students learn better than avoiding errors. 70 medical students practiced placing a dynamic hip screw on a simulator. One group was instructed to make and learn from mistakes, the other to avoid them. Researchers then tested their skills on a retention test and a transfer test to see which training method led to better long-term learning and ability to adapt to a new task.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Deliberate Flawed Performance (behavioral training method)
- What this could lead to
- If this approach works, it could lead to more effective simulation-based training for surgeons, potentially reducing errors in real surgeries.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage educational study with 70 medical students, not a clinical trial for a treatment. Results may not apply to experienced surgeons or real-world settings.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
70 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Dec 2024
- Finished
-
May 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Enrolled in medical school at University of Copenhagen passed exam in orthopaedic surgery Exclusion Criteria: * prior clinical or simulation-based osteosynthesis experience inability to participate in the transfer and retention test within the designated timeframe after the completion of training
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Simulation based medical education are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation
Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- How do countries train anesthesia residents? a global snapshot
- Can anesthesiologists handle the pressure? new study tests multitasking skills
- Simulation training boosts student skills in managing postpartum bleeding
- Simulation drills aim to sharpen Doctors' skills in postpartum emergencies
- Nurses vs. doctors: Who's better at this common procedure?
- Ultrasound training may boost spinal anaesthesia success