Can a better chat help heart patients decide? new trial tests shared Decision-Making
NCT ID NCT05711186
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Sep 17, 2026 · Updated 3 times
Summary
This study tests whether a structured shared decision-making process helps patients with severe aortic stenosis choose between two valve replacement options: TAVR (less invasive) and SAVR (surgery). 140 patients aged 70+ will be randomly assigned to either the structured approach or usual care. The goal is to see if the structured approach reduces confusion and regret about their treatment choice.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- structured shared decision-making approach
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that a structured conversation helps patients feel more confident and less regretful about their heart valve treatment choice.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-center trial testing a communication method, not a new drug or device. The results may not apply to all hospitals or patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 140 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Apr 2023
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
70 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age ≥ 70 years 2. Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis defined by an aortic valve area ≤1.0 cm2 or an aortic valve area indexed to body surface area \<0.6cm2/m2 3. Both SAVR and transfemoral TAVR as reasonable treatment options based on heart team decision Exclusion Criteria: 1. Life expectancy \<1 year irrespective of valvular heart disease 2. Inability to provide informed consent 3. Participation in another clinical trial with an active intervention
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Aortic valve stenosis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
2 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Bern University Hospital, Dep. of Cardiology
RECRUITINGBern, 3010, Switzerland
-
Spitalzentrum Biel
RECRUITINGBiel, 2501, Switzerland
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can aggressive blood pressure treatment slow aortic valve disease?
- Why do animal heart valves wear out? immune system under investigation
- One scan to rule them all? new CT aims to replace multiple heart tests
- Which heart valve design wins for small aortic openings?
- Can a less invasive valve replacement tame a failing aortic valve?
- Can a new heart valve match the safety of proven ones?