Head-to-Head: which biologic works better for tough psoriatic arthritis?
NCT ID NCT04632927
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tested two biologic drugs, secukinumab and ustekinumab, in 119 adults with active psoriatic arthritis who had not responded to or could not tolerate TNFα-inhibitor treatment. The main goal was to see which drug better improved physical function over 28 weeks. Researchers also looked at skin clearance and other outcomes. The trial is complete, and results are available.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Secukinumab (a biologic drug) and Ustekinumab (a biologic drug)
- What this could lead to
- If secukinumab works better than ustekinumab, it could offer a new treatment option for people with psoriatic arthritis who have not responded to other therapies.
- What could go wrong
- This is a completed Phase 3 trial with 119 participants, so results are more reliable than early-phase studies. However, individual responses vary, and both drugs have known side effects like increased infection risk.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 3
Large-scale testing in a bigger group. Usually the last step before a treatment can be approved.
- Participants
-
119 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Dec 2020
- Finished
-
Oct 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 99 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Key Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosis of PsA as classified by CASPAR criteria for at least 6 months before randomization. * Active PsA at baseline defined as ≥ 3 tender joints out of 68 and ≥ 3 swollen joints out of 66 (dactylitis of a digit counts as one joint each). * Inadequate response or intolerance to previous or current treatment with at least one TNFα inhibitor * Inadequate response or intolerance to conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) * Diagnosis of active plaque psoriasis, with at least one psoriatic plaque of ≥ 2 cm diameter and/or nail changes consistent with psoriasis and/or documented history of plaque psoriasis. * Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies negative at screening. Key Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnant or nursing women, * Previous exposure to secukinumab, ustekinumab or any other biologic drug directly targeting IL-17, IL-17 receptor, IL-12 or IL-23. * Patients for whom the use of secukinumab or ustekinumab is contraindicated. * Use of any other investigational drug. Previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapies including but not limited to anti-CD20 or investigational agents * Evidence of ongoing infectious or malignant process * Subjects receiving high potency opioid analgesics * Ongoing use of prohibited psoriasis treatments/medications Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Psoriatic arthritis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Rendsburg, Schleswig-Holstein, 24768, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Aachen, 52074, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Bad Bentheim, 48455, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Bad Doberan, 18209, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 12435, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 13125, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 13353, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Bochum, 44791, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Cologne, 50937, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Cologne, 51149, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Cottbus, 03042, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Dresden, 01067, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Dresden, 01307, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Ehringshausen, 35630, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Erlangen, 91056, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Frankfurt, 60590, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Gommern, 39245, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Göttingen, 37075, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamburg, 22391, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Herne, 44649, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Leipzig, 04103, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Magdeburg, 39104, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Magdeburg, 39110, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Mainz, 55131, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
München, 81541, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Planegg, 82152, Germany
-
Novartis Investigative Site
Ratingen, 40878, Germany
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a Job-Focused rehab program keep arthritis patients employed?
- Can an oral drug calm psoriatic arthritis? phase 3 trial puts deucravacitinib to the test
- Do rheumatic diseases quietly damage the Eye's oil glands?
- Can a questionnaire capture the real burden of psoriatic arthritis?
- Can a new pill calm psoriatic arthritis joint pain?
- A personal nurse and a plan: could this ease the daily burden of arthritis?