Reused walking boots put to the test: safe or risky?
NCT ID NCT07287969
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Aug 14, 2026 · Updated 3 times
Summary
This study looks at whether reusing walking boots is safe for people recovering from foot or ankle injuries. About 60 patients will be randomly assigned to get either a new boot or a cleaned, reused boot. The main goal is to see if reused boots cause more skin problems like blisters or rashes.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- walking boot (device)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that reusing walking boots is safe, reducing medical waste and lowering costs for patients.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage trial with only 60 participants, so results may not apply broadly. There is a risk of skin issues like blisters or rashes with reused boots.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 60 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Sep 2024
- Expected to finish
-
Sep 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
1 year to 17 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patient is of ambulatory age * Patient is ambulatory at baseline (i.e. prior to injury or intervention) * Patient is recovering from an acute foot or ankle injury (bony or soft tissue) * Patients expected to utilize the boot for \<12 weeks total * Prescribed in the outpatient clinic setting only Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with ongoing infection, skin lesions, or wounds * Immunosuppressed patients * Patients with autism or behavioral concerns * Non ambulatory patients * Fitted and provided in the operating room or inpatient settings
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Ankle injuries are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University of Utah Orthopedics
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- New turkish questionnaire aims to better track ankle fracture healing
- New skin patch could replace flap surgery for leg injuries
- New ankle test may slash re-injury risk for athletes after ligament surgery
- New foot training shows promise for ankle sprain relief in athletes
- New flap surgery aims to heal tough leg and foot wounds
- Ankle surgery showdown: which fix works best?