Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Robot vs. surgeon: which cochlear implant method gives better hearing?

NCT ID NCT07081542

First seen Jan 11, 2026 · Last updated Jun 22, 2026 · Updated 27 times

Summary

This study compares two ways to insert a cochlear implant: using a robotic device or the standard manual method. Researchers want to see which approach leads to better hearing one year after surgery. The study will enroll 32 adults with hearing loss, randomly assigning them to one of the two techniques. Both methods are already approved and considered safe.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HEARING IMPAIRMENT are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • AdventHealth Celebration

    Kissimmee, Florida, 34747, United States

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

    Contact

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

IotaSoft Robotic Insertion System

What this could lead to

If robotic insertion proves better, it could become the new standard for cochlear implants, potentially improving hearing outcomes and reducing inner ear damage.

What could go wrong

This is a small early-stage study with only 32 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The robotic device is already FDA-approved, but the study may find no significant difference between methods.

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Deafness hearing disorder hearing loss disorder Hearing Loss, Bilateral Hearing Loss, Sensorineural inner ear disorder sensorineural hearing loss disorder vestibular disorder X-linked mixed hearing loss with perilymphatic gusher

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.