Robot vs. laparoscope: which hernia surgery is better?
NCT ID NCT05839587
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two types of minimally invasive surgery for fixing inguinal hernias: robotic-assisted and standard laparoscopic. 150 adults were randomly assigned to one of the two procedures. The goal was to see if the robot's better vision and flexibility reduce the body's stress response and improve recovery. Researchers measured blood markers of inflammation and other outcomes like blood loss and hospital stay.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Robotic-assisted surgery
- What this could lead to
- If the robotic approach reduces surgical stress and speeds recovery, it could become a preferred option for inguinal hernia repair.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial comparing two surgical techniques. The robot may not show meaningful benefits over standard laparoscopy, and results may not apply to all hernia types or patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
150 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Nov 2022
- Finished
-
May 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * ASA 1- 3 * Clinical or radiologic diagnosis of inguinal hernia (unilateral, bilateral, recurrent, inguinoscrotal) * Eligible for a laparoscopic procedure * Informed concent Exclusion Criteria: * Incarcerated inguinal hernia requiring emergency surgery * Pregnancy * Patients with chronic pain due to arthritis, migraine or other illness requiring regular intake of pain relieve (paracetamol, NSAID etc) * Active cancer * History of psychiatric or additive disorder that prevent the patient from participating in the trial * Co-existing inflammatory disease * Co-existing immunological disease that requires medication of any kind
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Hernia, inguinal are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Sygehus Soenderjylland
Aabenraa, 6200, Denmark
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- New Turbine-Powered pump could make Children's laparoscopic surgery safer
- Smartphone Follow-Up could replace hospital stays after common surgeries
- Mind over matter: could your expectations shape surgery success?
- New study tests if natural mesh can prevent Long-Term pain after hernia surgery
- Glowing dye could make endometriosis surgery safer for the ureters
- New painkiller may reduce Post-Surgery nausea in women