Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Robots vs. surgeons: which is better for hysterectomy?

NCT ID NCT05613816

Knowledge-focused Sponsor: University Hospital Tuebingen Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compared robot-assisted laparoscopy using the Senhance Surgical System to conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy and other uterine surgeries. Researchers measured operating time, blood loss, and safety in 78 patients. The goal was to see if the robot offers advantages over standard minimally invasive surgery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Senhance Surgical System (robot-assisted surgical device)
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that robot-assisted surgery is as safe and efficient as conventional laparoscopy, potentially offering surgeons more precision.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed observational study, not a randomized trial, so results may not apply broadly. The robot may not improve outcomes or could increase costs.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

78 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Sep 2022

Finished

Jan 2024

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

primary care clinic

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * age ≥18 years * BMI ≤40 kg/m2 * indication for hysterectomy for benign disease or prophylactic surgery due to hereditary cancer * indication for radical hysterectomy and/or pelvic-/para-aortic (sentinel-node) lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer * indication for modified radical hysterectomy and/or pelvic-/para-aortic (sentinel-node) lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer * indication for other uterine conditions / adnexal conditions that require uterine/adnexal/tubal surgery: Fibroids, Endometriomas, Cystic masses, Ectopic pregnancies, Sactosalpinx, Inflammatory adnexal disease, Opportunistic salpingectomy as part of hysterectomy or exclusively, Cervico-/Sacrokolpopexy * size of uterus and vagina allows for retrieval by the vaginal route in cancer patients * written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * known extensive intra-abdominal adhesions * anaesthesiological contraindications to laparoscopy * women with pacemaker or other implants where electrosurgery is to be avoided * women with known defects of the hemostasis * pregnancy * other internal or anatomical criteria that preclude a minimal invasive approach * inability to understand patient information

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Cervical cancer are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

cervical cancer ectopic pregnancy endometrial cancer hereditary neoplastic syndrome ovarian cyst ovarian endometriosis pelvic inflammatory disease uterine corpus leiomyoma uterine disorder

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Uterine diseases

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • University Hospital Tuebingen, Department of Women's Health

    Tübingen, 72076, Germany

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.