Could 3 days beat 14? new study tests shorter catheter use for sudden urinary blockage
NCT ID NCT07283484
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
Acute urinary retention (AUR) is a sudden inability to urinate, often due to an enlarged prostate. The RELIEF study compares removing the catheter after 3 days versus the usual 14 days in 478 men. All participants receive a catheter and prostate medication. The goal is to see if a shorter duration is equally successful at restoring normal urination, while reducing discomfort and complications.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- alpha-blocker medication (tamsulosin, silodosin, or alfuzosin)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could lead to shorter, more comfortable catheter use for men with acute urinary retention, reducing infections and improving quality of life.
- What could go wrong
- This is a mid-sized trial, and results may not apply to all patients. A shorter catheter duration might increase the risk of needing re-catheterization.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 478 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Aug 2025
- Expected to finish
-
Mar 2029
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Male participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult men (≥18 years) * Diagnosis of acute urinary retention (AUR) treated with a transurethral catheter (TUC) and alpha-blocker therapy (tamsulosin, silodosin, or alfuzosin) * Mentally competent and able to understand the potential benefits and burdens of study participation * Provision of written or digital informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Failed prior TWOC within the preceding 30 days * Initial urinary retention volume \>1500 mL * Neurogenic bladder dysfunction (e.g., multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, spina bifida) * History of prostate cancer with ISUP grade group ≥2 * History of active bladder cancer or ongoing surveillance for bladder cancer * Urinary retention occurring within 72 hours after surgery (postoperative urinary retention) * History of lower urinary tract surgery (e.g., bladder augmentation, urethral surgery, or prostate surgery) * AUR suspected to be caused by bladder stones * Suspected urethral stricture, clot retention, or urosepsis * Contraindication to alpha-blocker therapy
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute urinary retention are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
11 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Alrijne Hospital
RECRUITINGLeiderdorp, South Holland, 2353 GA, Netherlands
-
Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital
RECRUITINGNijmegen, Gelderland, 6532SZ, Netherlands
-
Catharina Hospital
RECRUITINGEindhoven, North Brabant, 5623 EJ, Netherlands
-
Isala
RECRUITINGZwolle, Overijssel, 8025AB, Netherlands
-
Maastricht University Medical Center+
RECRUITINGMaastricht, Limburg, 6229 HX, Netherlands
-
Martini Hospital
RECRUITINGGroningen, Provincie Groningen, 9728NT, Netherlands
-
OLVG
RECRUITINGAmsterdam, North Holland, 1091 AC, Netherlands
-
Spaarne Gasthuis
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHoofddorp, North Holland, 2134 TM, Netherlands
-
St. Jansdal
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHarderwijk, Gelderland, 3844 DG, Netherlands
-
Ziekenhuisgroep Twente
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHengelo, Overijssel, 7555 DL, Netherlands
-
Zuyderland Ziekenhuis
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHeerlen, Limburg, 6419 PC, Netherlands
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A 5-Minute video may calm nerves and cut pain before prostate surgery
- Laser vs. water jet: which surgery for enlarged prostate is better?
- One-shot hormone blocker may prevent repeat urinary blockages in men
- Steam power: can a quick vapor treatment ease prostate symptoms for years?
- New study pits two prostate surgeries Head-to-Head for better outcomes
- Natural supplement combo may match standard drug for prostate relief