Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Hearing aid fitting showdown: default settings vs. precision measurements

NCT ID NCT05621798

Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Kuopio University Hospital Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study tested whether using real-ear measurements (REM) to fit hearing aids leads to better outcomes than using the manufacturer's default settings. 101 first-time hearing aid users participated. Researchers measured hearing ability, satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness to see if the extra step of REM is worthwhile.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Real-Ear Measurement (REM) fitting procedure
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that REM fitting improves hearing aid outcomes and is cost-effective, encouraging more audiologists to use it.
What could go wrong
This is a completed, small study (101 participants) comparing two fitting methods, not testing a new treatment. Results may not apply to all hearing aid users or settings.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

101 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Sep 2022

Finished

Sep 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 80 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * all first-time adult patients (18-80 years of age) eligible for bilateral hearing aid rehabilitation based on an evaluation by an otolaryngologist or an audiologist Exclusion Criteria: * confirmed cases of cognitive decline or dementia * unilateral or conductive hearing impairment

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Sensorineural hearing loss, bilateral are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Hearing Loss, Sensorineural sensorineural hearing loss disorder

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Sensorineural hearing loss, bilateral

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Kuopio University Hospital

    Kuopio, 70210, Finland

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.