Wrist vs groin: which artery route is best for stroke clot removal?
NCT ID NCT05903560
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two ways to reach a blood clot in the basilar artery, a key vessel at the back of the brain, during a stroke. One method uses the femoral artery in the groin, the other uses the radial artery in the wrist. Researchers want to see which approach leads to better recovery and fewer complications in 386 stroke patients.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- endovascular recanalization via radial or femoral approach
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that using the radial artery is a better, safer way to remove blood clots in the back of the brain during a stroke.
- What could go wrong
- This is a mid-sized trial, and results may not apply to all stroke types. The radial approach may be harder in some patients and could increase radiation exposure.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 386 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Jul 2023
- Expected to finish
-
Sep 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Acute ischemic stroke in the posterior circulation confirmed by symptoms and imaging examinations. 2. Basilar artery occlusion confirmed by computed tomographic angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). 3. Age ≥ 18 years. 4. Time from symptom onset to randomization within 24 hours of the estimated time of basilar artery occlusion. 5. Baseline NIHSS score ≥ 10 before randomization. 6. Intact dual circulation of the hand assessed by the modified Allen's test. 7. Written informed consent from patients or their legally authorized representatives. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Pre-stroke disability with mRS score ≥ 3. 2. Pregnant or lactating women. 3. Allergic to contrast agents or nitinol devices. 4. Participation in other clinical trials. 5. Systolic blood pressure \> 185 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure \> 110mmHg, and can not be controlled by antihypertensive drugs. 6. Known genetic or acquired bleeding diathesis, lack of coagulation factors; or oral anticoagulant therapy with INR \> 1.7. 7. Baseline lab values: blood glucose \< 50mg/dL (2.8mmol/L) or \> 400mg/dL (22.2 mmol/L), platelet count \< 50\*109 /L, or hematocrit \< 25%. 8. Life expectancy less than 1 year. 9. Lost to follow-up within 90 days (e.g. no fixed residence, overseas patients, etc.). 10. Acute ischemic stroke within 48 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention, cerebrovascular intervention, or major surgery (patients can be included if more than 48 hours). 11. Clinical manifestations of central nervous system vasculitis. 12. Premorbid nervous system diseases or mental disorders hindering the assessment of the disease. 13. Diseases or anatomical abnormalities that make it difficult for radial or femoral artery puncture, sheath insertion or instrument delivery, such as local infection, anatomical abnormalities confirmed by ultrasound or other imaging examinations, previous interventional or open surgery.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute ischemic stroke are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Department of Neurology, Jinling Hospital
RECRUITINGNanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can PET scans reveal hidden heart inflammation after a stroke?
- Can an implanted heart monitor catch hidden irregular heartbeats after stroke?
- China builds national watchdog for brain blood vessel devices
- Can tiny neural exosomes help the brain heal after a severe stroke?
- Can a new antibody boost recovery after severe stroke?
- After stroke, a balloon or a stent? trial tests which rescue opens blocked brain arteries better