Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Wrist vs groin: which artery route is best for stroke clot removal?

NCT ID NCT05903560

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two ways to reach a blood clot in the basilar artery, a key vessel at the back of the brain, during a stroke. One method uses the femoral artery in the groin, the other uses the radial artery in the wrist. Researchers want to see which approach leads to better recovery and fewer complications in 386 stroke patients.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
endovascular recanalization via radial or femoral approach
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that using the radial artery is a better, safer way to remove blood clots in the back of the brain during a stroke.
What could go wrong
This is a mid-sized trial, and results may not apply to all stroke types. The radial approach may be harder in some patients and could increase radiation exposure.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 386 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Jul 2023

Expected to finish

Sep 2026

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Acute ischemic stroke in the posterior circulation confirmed by symptoms and imaging examinations. 2. Basilar artery occlusion confirmed by computed tomographic angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). 3. Age ≥ 18 years. 4. Time from symptom onset to randomization within 24 hours of the estimated time of basilar artery occlusion. 5. Baseline NIHSS score ≥ 10 before randomization. 6. Intact dual circulation of the hand assessed by the modified Allen's test. 7. Written informed consent from patients or their legally authorized representatives. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Pre-stroke disability with mRS score ≥ 3. 2. Pregnant or lactating women. 3. Allergic to contrast agents or nitinol devices. 4. Participation in other clinical trials. 5. Systolic blood pressure \> 185 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure \> 110mmHg, and can not be controlled by antihypertensive drugs. 6. Known genetic or acquired bleeding diathesis, lack of coagulation factors; or oral anticoagulant therapy with INR \> 1.7. 7. Baseline lab values: blood glucose \< 50mg/dL (2.8mmol/L) or \> 400mg/dL (22.2 mmol/L), platelet count \< 50\*109 /L, or hematocrit \< 25%. 8. Life expectancy less than 1 year. 9. Lost to follow-up within 90 days (e.g. no fixed residence, overseas patients, etc.). 10. Acute ischemic stroke within 48 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention, cerebrovascular intervention, or major surgery (patients can be included if more than 48 hours). 11. Clinical manifestations of central nervous system vasculitis. 12. Premorbid nervous system diseases or mental disorders hindering the assessment of the disease. 13. Diseases or anatomical abnormalities that make it difficult for radial or femoral artery puncture, sheath insertion or instrument delivery, such as local infection, anatomical abnormalities confirmed by ultrasound or other imaging examinations, previous interventional or open surgery.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute ischemic stroke are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Department of Neurology, Jinling Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.