Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Which brace works best for Kids' crossbite? new study aims to find out

NCT ID NCT07500194

First seen Apr 15, 2026 · Last updated Jun 20, 2026 · Updated 12 times

Summary

This study will compare two fixed dental appliances—the Quad Helix and Rapid Maxillary Expanders—for treating posterior crossbite in 20 Egyptian children aged 9-12. The goal is to see which device widens the upper jaw more effectively and causes less discomfort. Results could help dentists choose the best option for young patients.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for POSTERIOR CROSSBITE are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • Faculty of Dental medicine (boys) ,Cairo,Al-Azhar University

    Cairo, Cairo Governorate, 00000, Egypt

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

Quad Helix appliance and Rapid Maxillary Expander (dental devices)

What this could lead to

If successful, this study could show which device works better and is more comfortable for correcting crossbites in children, improving dental health and treatment experience.

What could go wrong

This is a small, early-stage trial with only 20 children, so results may not apply to everyone. The study hasn't started yet, and there is always a chance that neither device proves clearly better.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.