Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Could a simpler tooth procedure spare kids from root canals?

NCT ID NCT06183203

Disease control Sponsor: Nebu Philip Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled This study
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Aug 13, 2026 · Last updated Aug 14, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two dental procedures for treating severe pulpitis (tooth nerve inflammation) in children's baby molars. One is a standard full root canal treatment (pulpectomy), and the other is a less invasive option that removes only part of the nerve (pulpotomy). The goal is to see if the simpler procedure works just as well in relieving pain and saving the tooth over two years. Children aged 4 to 9 with a painful, vital baby molar may participate.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Pulpotomy (partial pulp removal) compared to pulpectomy (full root canal treatment) in baby molars
What this could lead to
If pulpotomy works as well as the standard full root canal, it could offer a simpler, faster, and less stressful treatment option for young children with severe tooth decay.
What could go wrong
This is an early-stage trial with no results yet. Pulpotomy may not be as effective long-term as pulpectomy, and there is a risk of treatment failure requiring further procedures.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Expected to start

Feb 2024

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Jun 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

4 to 9 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Healthy (ASA I and II) co-operative children (Frankl Scale + and ++) between the ages of four and nine years. 2. Participants have symptoms typical of irreversible pulpitis in one of the primary molars. 3. The pulp of the affected primary molar is vital. 4. Radicular pulp health is confirmed by attainment of radicular pulp haemostasis within 8 minutes of coronal pulp amputation. 5. The affected primary molars can be restored with full coverage crowns. 6. Any physiologic root resorption, if present, is less than ⅓ the root length Exclusion Criteria: 1. Clinical examination of affected primary molar reveals signs of pulpal infection (e.g. pathologic tooth mobility, parulis/fistula, or soft tissue swelling) 2. Pre-operative periapical radiograph suggests presence of periapical radiolucency. 3. Pre-operative periapical radiograph suggests presence of furcal radiolucency more than ½ the furcation to periapical area. 4. Visual examination of pulp tissue after deroofing reveals signs of necrosis (e.g. avascular/minimally bleeding pulp tissue or yellowish necrotic areas/purulent exudate). 5. Signs of extensive radicular pulp inflammation. 6. Parents not willing to place full coverage crowns post-treatment. 7. Clinical diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis between two primary molars is not sharply defined

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Irreversible pulpitis are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

pulpitis

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Irreversible pulpitis

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Christian Dental College

    Ludhiana, Punjab, 141008, India

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.