Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Can your own blood ease back pain? PRP vs steroids for sacroiliac joints

NCT ID NCT05121961

Symptom relief Sponsor: University of Utah Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compared two injections for sacroiliac joint pain: platelet-rich plasma (PRP) made from the patient's own blood, and a standard steroid/anesthetic mix. Fifty adults with confirmed sacroiliac joint pain received one of the two injections. Researchers measured pain levels and disability scores to see which treatment worked better.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
platelet-rich plasma (PRP)
What this could lead to
If PRP works better than steroids, it could offer a longer-lasting, natural treatment option for sacroiliac joint pain without relying on repeated steroid injections.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study with only 50 participants. PRP may not prove superior to standard steroid injections, and results may not apply to everyone with back pain.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

50 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Feb 2020

Finished

Jun 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Adult (\>18 y/o) males and females referred for therapeutic injection to the investigators spine interventional service by a physiatrist or pain anesthesiologist with a clinical diagnosis of SIJ pain confirmed by history * 50% or greater reduction in pain by a diagnostic anesthetic block using no more than 1.5 cc 2% lidocaine performed under imaging guidance by a pain interventionalist (PM\&R, Pain Anesthesia, or Neuroradiology Spine Intervention). * Baseline pain must be \>/=4 by numeric rating scale (NRS), at least 6 weeks in chronicity, and must not be multi-factorial (related to radiculopathy or axial pain localizing elsewhere) by physical examination or confounding medical history (infection, inflammatory spondyloarthropathy, or osseous metastatic disease). Exclusion Criteria: * SIJ steroid treatment within the prior 6 months. * Patients with a history of infection currently on antibiotic therapy * Usage of systemic immunosuppressants * Pregnancy

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Low back pain are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

arthritis, sacroiliac Low Back Pain synovitis

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Low back pain Sacroiliac joint synovitis

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • University of Utah

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States

  • Veterans Administration Salt Lake City Health Care System

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84148, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.