New eye drug PRO-169 takes on lucentis in major trial
NCT ID NCT05217680
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested a new eye medication called PRO-169 against a standard drug (ranibizumab) for people with diabetic macular edema, a condition that causes vision loss in people with diabetes. About 509 adults with diabetes took part, receiving injections into the eye over one year. The goal was to see if PRO-169 works as well as the standard treatment at improving eyesight.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 3
Large-scale testing in a bigger group. Usually the last step before a treatment can be approved.
- Participants
-
509 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
May 2021
- Finished
-
Nov 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥ 18 years * Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (type 1 or 2) evidenced by: use of insulin or use of oral hypoglycemic medications or diagnosis for DM according to OMS or ADA criteria. * Is capable of rendering informed consent. * HbA1c \<8.5% in selection visit. * All men and women capable of reproduction may agree to use a barrier birth control method during the study and 3 months after the last intravitreal injection applied. * Only one eye may be randomized per participating individual, in case both are eligible, the investigator may choose either eye according his/her criteria. * BVCA according to ETDRS between \<78 (20/32 or worse) and \>24 (20/320 or better) within 8 days prior to the randomization. * Clinically evident diabetic macular edema, with central macular thickening. * Diabetic macular edema demonstrated in OCT scan (macular central thickness \> 300 μm for men and \> 290 μm for women) within 8 days prior to the randomization. * Presenting characteristics that allow an adequate fundus examination (transparent means, adequate pupil dilation, etc). Exclusion Criteria: * Chronic renal disease with renal insufficiency that requires dialysis or transplant. * Individuals with conditions that may compromise their participation during the span of the study (unstable concomitant diseases, possible change of residence, etc) * Individuals with a poor glycemic control who have started insulin treatment within 4 months previous to the study. * Participation in another clinical study (at least 90 days must have elapsed between the finalization of his/her participation in a previous essay and randomization in the present study). * Known allergies to the treatment. * Poorly controlled blood pressure (average of 3 readings while sitting with ≥160 mmHg systolic or ≥100 mmHg diastolic in the selection visit. * Heart attack or other cardiovascular event (cerebral vascular disease, transitory ischemia, hospitalization for cardiac insufficiency) during the 4 months prior to the start of the study, or patients with active myocardial insufficiency. * Previous systemic treatment with VEGF-related medications within 4 months prior to the start of the study. * Women of child-bearing age who are pregnant, lactating of planning to get pregnant within the time span of the study. * Known allergy to anesthetic medications used during the procedures, intravitreal injection and photocoagulation. * Diagnosis of non-diabetic macular edema. * Ophthalmic conditions that interfere with the evaluation of BCVA (for example: foveal atrophy, pigmentary abnormalities, dense foveal exudates, etc) * Additional conditions to DM that may compromise the evaluation of the edema (for example: venous occlusions, uveitis or other inflammatory diseases, neovascular glaucoma, etc) * Lens opacities that according to the LOCS III classification system exceed one or more of the following: \> NO3C3, \> C2, \> P1. * Previous history of anti-VEGF treatment for diabetic macular edema or any treatment for diabetic macular edema within 4 months prior to the start of the study (corticosteroids, photocoagulation, etc) * Anticipation of the need of panphotocoagulation (for example: proliferative diabetic retinopathy or any other indication) during the period of the study or history of panphotocoagulation within the 4 months prior to the start of the study. * History of ocular surgery (cataract extraction, any intraocular surgery, aphakia, etc) within 4 months prior to the start of the study, or planned to occur within the time span of the study. * Intraocular pressure \> 21 mmHg, measured through Goldmann tonometry during the selection visit. * Presence of macular ischemia or important loss of perifoveal capilaries (avascular foveal zone greater than 350 μm) demonstrated through fluorescein angiography during the selection visit. * Evidence of macular traction and hyaloid thickening in OCT scan. * History of YAG capsulotomy within 2 months prior to the randomization. * Evidence of external ocular infections or any important disease of the ocular surface. * History of vitrectomy.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Diabetic macular edema are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
SalaUno Salud, S.A.P.I. de C.V.
Mexico City, 06030, Mexico
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- The 20-Minute squeeze: how eye injections push pressure up
- Could years of eye injections weigh down the upper eyelid?
- Eye implant takes aim at diabetic macular edema
- Can a single gene therapy injection ease diabetic macular edema?
- Can a new eye injection preserve vision in south asians with diabetes?
- Could a biosimilar eye injection offer a new way to treat diabetic macular edema?