Cream or cleanser? study seeks best way to stop C-Section infections
NCT ID NCT07474194
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tests whether applying a clindamycin cream or a povidone-iodine wash inside the vagina before a planned C-section better prevents wound infections afterward. About 150 healthy pregnant women between 37 and 40 weeks will take part. The goal is to find which method is more effective at reducing surgical site infections.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 4
Runs after approval, following long-term safety and how well the treatment works in everyday use.
- Participants
-
About 150 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Sep 2025
- Expected to finish
-
May 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 40 years
- Sex
-
Female participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * female participants with singleton pregnancies scheduled for elective cesarean sections at term, specifically between 37 and 40 weeks of gestation * free from any medical disorders. * The participants' ages ranged from 18 to 40 years * body mass index (BMI) ranged from 18 to 30 kg/m2 Exclusion Criteria: 1. Cases of urgent or emergent CS. 2. Abnormal vaginal secretion (bad smelling yellowish secretion, whitish cheesy discharge with pruritus, bloody discharge; etc…). 3. Women with medical disorders such as pre-gestational diabetes, anemia, hypertension, preeclampsia, or immunosuppressant pregnant women. 4. Women who had a skin infection adjacent to the operative site. 5. Allergy to topical povidone-iodine or clindamycin 6. Feverish patients or history of premature rupture of membranes or with placenta previa. 7. patients lost during follow-up were excluded from the final analysis.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Infection control / methods are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Beni suef university
RECRUITINGBanī Suwayf, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Probiotic secretions take aim at MRSA's armor in wound infections
- A simple drain may slash wound infections after gynecologic cancer surgery
- Drone Warfare's hidden toll: new study tracks infection risk in combat wounds
- Vacuum bandage may shield ECMO patients from wound infections
- Wound injection may slash infection risk in emergency abdominal surgery
- New antibiotic dosing method could cut infections after heart surgery