Gum graft showdown: which method gives the best bridge base?
NCT ID NCT07434297
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tested two ways to improve gum shape where a missing tooth will be replaced by a fixed bridge. Both methods use a small piece of tissue taken from the roof of the mouth. One method removes all the surface skin from the graft, the other leaves part of it. The goal is to see which gives thicker, healthier gum tissue for a better-looking and more functional bridge. Twenty-four adults with one or more missing teeth took part.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- connective tissue graft (from the roof of the mouth)
- What this could lead to
- If one graft works better, dentists may have a clearer choice for improving gum shape before placing a dental bridge.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with only 24 people. Results may not apply to everyone, and the two graft types may show little difference.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
24 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Dec 2024
- Finished
-
Feb 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
20 to 45 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * age 20-45 years * medically free * bounded missing teeth * patient accepting the fixed prosthetics as a treatment option * restorable adjacent abutments * periodontally healthy adjacent abutments * motivated patient to have the treatment * bleeding and plaque index less than 20% Exclusion Criteria: * systemic diseases * smoking * pregnancy * patients with pervious soft tissue grafting
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Pontic site development are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Modern Sciences and Arts University
Giza, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.