Can a Parkinson's psychosis drug tame impulse control disorders?
NCT ID NCT03947216
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study tested whether pimavanserin, a drug already approved for hallucinations in Parkinson's, can reduce impulse control disorders like compulsive gambling, shopping, or eating. 117 people with Parkinson's and moderate-to-severe impulse control problems took either pimavanserin or a placebo daily for 8 weeks. The goal was to see if the drug could lessen these behaviors safely.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- pimavanserin (brand name Nuplazid)
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could offer a new treatment option for impulse control disorders in Parkinson's disease, potentially reducing problematic behaviors without worsening motor symptoms.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-phase (phase 2) study. The results may not confirm effectiveness, and the drug may not work for everyone. Side effects are possible, though pimavanserin has a generally good safety profile.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 2
Tests whether the treatment actually works, and watches for side effects, in a larger group.
- Participants
-
117 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Oct 2020
- Finished
-
Jun 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
35 to 75 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patient with PD according to the UKPDSBB criteria for at least 1 year before randomization 2. Patient, man or woman, aged from 35 to 75 years old 3. Patient with moderately severe ICD assessed by QUIP-RS (each item being rated 0-16) defined as: * a combined ICD total score (defined as the sum of the 4 ICD sub-scores (pathological gambling + buying + hypersexuality + eating)) superior or equal to 10 or, * at least one of the 4 ICD sub-scores in the following range: 1. "pathological gambling" sub-score from 6 to 12 (included), 2. "buying" sub-score from 8 to 12 (included), 3. "hypersexuality" sub-score from 8 to 12 (included), 4. "eating" sub-score from 7 to 12 (included) (Weintraub et al., 2012). The use of "lower" margins will guarantee that the patient experiences behavioral disturbances severe enough to justify pimavanserin treatment. On the other hand, the use of "upper" margins will guarantee that the patients included in the trial will not suffer from ICD severe enough to question ethically the use of placebo during the 8 weeks of the treatment. Eligibility of patients with QUIP-RS sub-scores above 12 will be assessed upon investigator's request by an adjudication committee composed by independent experts external to the study (cf IX.3 Adjudication Committee). 4. ICD onset after PD onset and after initiation of dopaminergic drugs 5. Patient treated by dopaminergic drugs for at least 3 months before randomization 6. Patient treated with a stable regimen of levodopa, dopamine agonists, COMT and MAOB inhibitors, amantadine, anticholinergic, antidepressant and benzodiazepine for at least 1 month before the randomization and be willing to remain on the same doses throughout the course of their participation in the trial (Papay et al., 2014) 7. Patient with health insurance 8. Patient/ guardian / curator who sign the written informed consent 9. For women of childbearing potential, use of an effective contraception method\* for at least 1 month prior to randomization until 8 weeks after the last dose of study drug administration. Women who do not have an effective contraception\* must : have had her last natural menstruation ≥24 months prior to the selection visit, or have been surgically sterilized prior to the selection visit, or have had a hysterectomy prior to the selection visit. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patient suffering from another parkinsonian syndrome (multiple system atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, Lewy body dementia, corticobasal degeneration) 2. Patient who have a known hypersensitivity to the study treatment, based on known allergies to drugs of the same class 3. Stroke, uncontrolled serious medical illness, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, cardiac function disorders, within 6 months before randomization 4. Patient with history of long QT syndrome 5. Patient with long QTcB detected with ECG at inclusion visit (\> 450 ms) 6. Patient treated with antipsychotic drugs during the last three months before randomization 7. Patient treated with concomitant medication leading to torsade de pointes (TdP) without discontinuation ≥ 5 half-lives before randomization (please refer to medications list with known risks of TdP on appendix XVII.5.10 and check website https://crediblemeds.org/index.php/tools/ for the most up-to-date information) 8. Patient with hydro-electrolytics troubles, particularly hypokaliemia or hypocalcemia not corrected, at inclusion visit or assessed no later than 8 days before randomization. To be eligible, the patient's electrolyte values should be within the following limits: 3.5 ≤ K+ ≤ 5 mmol/L 135 ≤ Na+ ≤ 145 mmol/L 2,20 ≤ Ca2+ ≤ 2,60 mmol/L 9. Patient treated with a strong or moderate CYP3A4 inducer: carbamazepine, rifampicin, phenytoin, modafinil, efavirenz or a strong inhibitor of CYP3A4: azole antifungals, protease inhibitors, macrolids, without discontinuation ≥ 5 half-lives before randomization 10. Patient treated with medicinal plants interacting with CYP3A4 without discontinuation ≥ 5 half-lives before randomization (Echinacea (E.pupurea, E.angustifolia and E.pallida), Piperina, Artemisia, St. John's Wort and Ginkgo 11. Patient with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (Nasreddine et al., 2005) score \< 20 (to exclude patients likely with dementia) at inclusion visit (Papay et al., 2014). 12. Patient suffering from severe depression or marked suicidal thoughts (score \> 3 on the suicidal thoughts item of the MADRS) at inclusion visit (Papay et al., 2014) 13. History of DBS within the past year before randomization, or change in stimulation parameters less than one month prior to randomization 14. Hematologic or solid malignancy diagnosis within 5 years prior to randomization. \[Note: Subjects with a history of localized skin cancer, basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma, may be enrolled in the study as long as they are cancer free prior to randomization. Subjects with other localized cancers (without metastatic spread) who have previously completed their course of treatment more than 5 years prior to randomization, are not currently receiving treatment and have been in remission may be enrolled only if, in the opinion of the Investigator, there is no expectation for recurrence or further cancer treatment during the study period. Antihormonal therapy (e.g., tamoxifen) is allowed if the subject's cancer is in remission and the subject is on stable maintenance therapy to reduce their risk of recurrence.\] 15. Patient suffering from severe renal impairment define as CrCL\<30 mL/min, Cockcroft-Gault at inclusion visit or assessed no later than 8 days before randomization 16. Clinically significant hepatic impairment 17. Concurrent participation in another research involving a drug or medical device 18. Patient with language barriers precluding adequate understanding or co-operation or who, in the opinion of the investigator, should not participate in the trial 19. Treatment with an investigational treatment within 30 days prior to randomization 20. Woman pregnant, nursing or of childbearing potential age without effective contraception methods\* or intends to become pregnant. * an effective contraception method is defined as implants, oral oestro-progestative contraceptives or progestative which inhibit ovulation contraceptives (e.g, desogestrel), or double barrier method (condom plus spermicide or diaphragm plus spermicide) or levonorgestrel intrauterine devices, or vasectomized partner (confirmed with two negative spermograms).
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Parkinson disease are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Centre d'Inverstigation Clinique, CHU de Poitiers
Poitiers, 86021, France
-
SERVICE DE NEUROLOGIE C, Unité mouvement anormaux/Centre expert Parkinson, CHU de Lyon, Hopital neurologique Pierre Wertheimer
Bron, 69677, France
-
SERVICE DE NEUROLOGIE Centre Expert Parkinson Hopital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière
Paris, 75651, France
-
SERVICE DE NEUROLOGIE Unité de Mouvements Anormaux/Centre expert Parkinson, CHU de Strasbourg, Hopital de Hautepierre
Strasbourg, 67098, France
-
SERVICE DE NEUROLOGIE, CHU de REIMS
Reims, 51100, France
-
SERVICE DE NEUROLOGIE, Unité Mouvement Anormaux/Centre expert Parkinson, CHU de Lille, Hopital Roger Salengro
Lille, 59037, France
-
SERVICE DE NEUROLOGIE, Unité Mouvement Anormaux/Centre expert Parkinson, Hopital de la Timone
Marseille, 13385, France
-
SERVICE DE NEUROLOGIE, Unité Mouvements Anormaux/Centre expert Parkinson CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Hopital Gabriel Montpied
Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France
-
SERVICE DE NEUROLOGIE, Unité Mouvements Anormaux/Centre expert Parkinson, CHU de Grenoble Alpes
Grenoble, 38043, France
-
SERVICE DE NEUROLOGIE, Unité Mouvements Anormaux/Centre expert Parkinson, CHU de Limoges
Limoges, 87042, France
-
SERVICE DE NEUROLOGIE, Unité Mouvements Anormaux/Centre expert Parkinson, CHU de Rennes, Hopital Pontchaillou
Rennes, 35033, France
-
SERVICE DE NEUROLOGIE, Unité Mouvements Anormaux/Centre expert Parkinson, CHU de Rouen, Hopital Charles Nicolle
Rouen, 76031, France
-
SERVICE DE NEUROLOGIE, Unité Mouvements Anormaux/Centre expert Parkinson, CIC, CHU de Nantes, Hopital Laennec
Nantes, 44093, France
-
SERVICE DE NEUROLOGIE, Unité Mouvements Anormaux/Centre expert Parkinson, CIC, CHU de Toulouse, Hopital Pierre-Paul Riquet
Toulouse, 31059, France
-
SERVICE DE NEUROLOGIE, Unité Mouvements Anormaux/Centre expert Parkinson, Hopital Henri Mondor
Créteil, 94010, France
-
Service de Neurologie and CIC -CHU Besançon
Besançon, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a massive data registry crack the code of Parkinson's and related brain diseases?
- Reading the Brain's signals to predict who benefits from deep brain stimulation
- Giving Parkinson's patients a say may boost their Brain's ability to learn movement
- Brain scans probe why some Parkinson's patients freeze Mid-Step
- Can tango rewire the brain? dance program tested for Parkinson's and dementia
- Can a workout after walking practice help Parkinson's patients learn better?