Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Electric needle therapy shows promise for foot pain

NCT ID NCT05370092

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study tested whether a procedure called percutaneous needle electrolysis can help people with posterior tibial tendinopathy, a common cause of foot pain. 46 adults with pain for at least 3 months were split into two groups to compare the treatment against a control. Researchers measured pain levels and foot function before and after treatment to see if the electrolysis made a difference.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
percutaneous needle electrolysis
What this could lead to
If it works, this could offer a non-surgical option to reduce pain and improve foot function for people with posterior tibial tendon problems.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed trial with only 46 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The treatment is not widely used and its long-term benefits are unknown.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

46 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Mar 2022

Finished

Jun 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Subjects over 18 years of age * Mild inflammation, swelling and/or tenderness posterior to the medial malleolus * Pain posterior and/or superior to the medial malleolus, aggravated by activity * Pain present for at least 3 months * One or more signs of flexible flatfoot deformity, including excessive valgus deformity of the hindfoot during weight bearing and/or excessive foot abduction (many toes sign). * Pain when performing the Hell Rise Test or performed incorrectly. * Signs of tenosynovitis on ultrasound examination. As the inclusion criteria are based on side-to-side comparison all participants had to have unilateral involvement. Exclusion Criteria: * Previous surgery on the affected foot, leg or knee. * Disabling osteoarthritis of the knee on the affected side. * Fixed hindfoot deformities. * Recurrent ankle sprains on the affected side. * Ligament tears or bony abnormalities of the affected foot. * A physical or medical condition that contraindicates the testing protocol. * Pregnancy. * FCD or FLH tendinopathy.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Posterior tibial tendinopathy are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

disease of the tendon Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

    Madrid, Madrid, 28933, Spain

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.