Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

New study tests which surgery works best for rectal prolapse in women

NCT ID NCT07673406

Disease control Sponsor: Azerbaijan Medical University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing This study
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 29, 2026 · Last updated Jun 30, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial compares two surgical techniques for women with full-thickness rectal prolapse: a modified rectosacrouteropexy and the standard Wells rectopexy. The goal is to see which method leads to fewer recurrences, fewer complications, and better pelvic floor function. Thirty-six women will be assigned to one of the two procedures and followed after surgery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
surgical procedure (modified rectosacrouteropexy vs. Wells rectopexy)
What this could lead to
If one technique proves better, it could reduce prolapse recurrence and improve pelvic floor function after surgery.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study with only 36 participants, so results may not apply to all women. Surgery carries risks like infection or mesh complications.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

36 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jan 2022

Expected to finish

Jan 2028

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

47 to 75 years

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Female patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse Patients scheduled for surgical treatment with modified rectosacrouteropexy with pelvic peritonization Ability to complete postoperative follow-up assessments Exclusion Criteria: * Male patients Patients without full-thickness rectal prolapse Contraindication to surgery or anesthesia Severe uncontrolled medical condition that could interfere with participation or follow-up

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

pelvic organ prolapse rectal prolapse

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) Rectal prolapse

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Surgery, Biochemistry

    Baku, AZ1030, Azerbaijan

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.