Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

New pain block could beat epidural for bladder surgery recovery

NCT ID NCT06324253

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This completed study compared two ways to control pain after radical cystectomy (bladder removal) surgery: thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block. Twenty patients aged 40-70 were enrolled. The goal was to see which method provides better pain relief and fewer side effects.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
bupivacaine
What this could lead to
If one method proves better, it could offer patients a more effective or safer way to manage pain after bladder removal surgery.
What could go wrong
This is a very small, early study with only 20 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. It compares two existing techniques, not a new breakthrough.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

20 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Mar 2024

Finished

Jun 2024

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: \- Eligible patients will be older than 40-70 years old with american society of ASA physical anesthesiologist status I, II and III scheduled for elective radical cystectomy surgeries Exclusion Criteria: * Patients who have allergy to any of the study drugs. * Patients who are on opioids. * Known abuse of alcohol or medication. * Local infection at the site of injection or systemic infection. * Pregnancy * Patients with coagulation disorders or on anticoagulation therapy

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Bladder cancer are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Pain, Postoperative urinary bladder carcinoma

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Menoufia university

    Cairo, Shibin Elkom, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.