Can fewer radiation sessions be safer for lung cancer?
NCT ID NCT07777614
First seen Aug 20, 2026 · Last updated Aug 21, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial is testing two different radiation schedules for people with peripheral lung cancer or a single lung metastasis. One group receives the standard five-session treatment, while the other gets an experimental three-session approach. The goal is to see if the shorter schedule causes fewer severe side effects while still controlling the tumor. The study includes adults with inoperable tumors who are fit enough for treatment.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Image-guided stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) given in either 3 or 5 sessions
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help tailor radiation dosing for lung cancer, reducing side effects while maintaining tumor control.
- What could go wrong
- This is a phase 2 trial, so results are preliminary. The shorter 3-fraction schedule might not be as safe or effective as the standard 5-fraction approach.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 2
Tests whether the treatment actually works, and watches for side effects, in a larger group.
- Participants
-
About 208 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Oct 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Jun 2035
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
A research network
The lead sponsor is a research network or cooperative group.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Written informed consent obtained prior to any study-specific procedures. 2. ≥ 18 years of age. 3. Life expectancy \>6 months. 4. ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status of 0-2. 5. Histological diagnosis (biopsy or cytology) or radiological diagnosis (tumour which meets definition of 'measurable' per RECIST criteria and eligible for local ablative therapy per multi-disciplinary team (MDT) recommendations) of either: (i) Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, large cell): T1-T2 N0 M0 tumour (AJCC 8th edition) and selected T3 and T4 N0M0 which has only one lesion (a co-existing lesion unlikely to interfere with treatment or assessment of outcomes is permitted) to be treated for the purpose of the study OR (ii) Single pulmonary oligometastatic lesion to be treated for the purpose of the study. (Note: for (i) and (ii), a co-existing lesion(s) unlikely to interfere with treatment or assessment of outcomes is (are) permitted). 6. Patients with peripherally located tumours, defined as tumours not fulfilling the UK 2022 SABR Consortium Consensus optimal 3 fraction constraints for Chest wall (0.1 cc \<36.9 Gy) or (30 cc \< 30 Gy), with standard Planning Target Volume (PTV) coverage due to the proximity of their tumour to the chest wall , but which are predicted to meet the CTRIAL-IE 24-15 OPTIMISE Lung SABR Study dose volume constraints with dose escalation optimised to the Gross Tumour Volume (GTV). 7. Inoperable (as per MDT) or patient refuses surgery. 8. People of childbearing potential must not be pregnant or lactating and must be prepared to take adequate contraception methods during treatment. People whose partners are of child-bearing potential must be prepared to take adequate contraception methods during treatment. 9. Absence of psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical condition, or psychiatric illness/social situation potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule Exclusion Criteria: 1. Known co-existing or prior malignancy within the last 5 years (except for adequately treated basal cell carcinoma which is likely to interfere with treatment or assessment of outcomes. 2. Evidence of regional (nodal) or distant metastases or metastatic pleural effusion for patients with primary NSCLC. 3. Malignant spinal canal involvement. 4. Patients with syndromes or conditions associated with increased radiosensitivity. 5. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis / usual interstitial pneumonia. 6. Chemotherapy and/or other targeted therapy administered within 3 months prior to study radiotherapy (RT) or planned for \<6 weeks following RT for patients with primary NSCLC, or within 1 week prior to study RT or planned within 1 week following RT for patients with an oligometastatic lesion. 7. Any previous RT to the thorax or mediastinum (excluding previous breast or Chest Wall RT) which is likely to interfere with treatment or assessment of outcomes. 8. Any tumour not clinically definable on the treatment planning CT scan (e.g. surrounding consolidation or atelectasis). 9. Patients unable to undergo 4-Dimensional Computed Tomography (4DCT scan). 10. Uncontrolled intercurrent illness that is likely to interfere with treatment or assessment of outcomes. 11. Evidence of any other significant clinical disorder or laboratory finding that makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the study, or if it is felt by the research/ medical team that the patient may not be able to comply with the protocol.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Non-small cell lung cancer are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The study's own enquiry address
This study publishes an address for enquiries. See it below .
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Study contacts
-
Contact
Email: •••••@•••••
Locations
-
St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network (SLRON) at St Luke's Hospital and St James's Hospital
Dublin, D06 HH36, Ireland
Contact Email: •••••@•••••
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Two-Drug combo targets stubborn KRAS lung cancer
- Smaller chest drain may speed recovery after lung cancer surgery
- Gut bacteria may hold clues to why some cancer treatments work better
- Breath-Tracking sensor aims to sharpen lung cancer scans
- Can PET scan signals predict who beats lung cancer with immunotherapy?
- Two-Drug combo takes aim at Hard-to-Treat lung cancer