Breath of fresh air: simple test reveals best inhaler combo for COPD attacks
NCT ID NCT06495047
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at 37 people with COPD who were having a lung-attack (sudden worsening of breathing). Researchers compared two treatment strategies: using only short-acting rescue inhalers versus adding long-acting inhalers. They used a safe, easy breathing test called oscillometry to measure lung function. The goal was to find which approach opens the airways best, helping patients breathe easier sooner.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
37 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jun 2025
- Finished
-
Jul 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Patients with COPD diagnosed with and receiving treatment for an acute exacerbation (AECOPD) who are being treated with both short-acting and long-acting bronchodilator therapies. Convenience sampling approach.
- Ages
-
40 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Males and females, age ≥ 40, who are former/current smokers with a ≥10 pack-year smoking history. 2. COPD previously confirmed by spirometry (FEV1/FVC \< 0.7) of any severity (GOLD 1-4). 3. Currently experiencing and receiving treatment for a physician-diagnosed AECOPD with both long-acting and short-acting bronchodilators prescribed by their treating team. 4. Ability to participate without supplemental oxygen during the oscillometry tests. 5. Ability to provide informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: 1. No COPD diagnosis. 2. AECOPD is not the principal cause of urgent care visit, emergency department visit, or hospitalization. 3. Treatment strategy in which LABDs were held by the treating medical team (SABD-only approach). 4. Participant already performed spirometry on the same day of testing. 5. Inability to provide informed consent.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for COPD are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1, Canada
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can Device-Preserved donor lungs boost transplant success?
- Tiny One-Way valves for emphysema under close watch in japan
- Is RSV a hidden driver of severe COPD attacks?
- Can Mountain-Air rehab loosen stiff COPD airways?
- Can a breath of extra oxygen boost lung rehab?
- Can a handheld breathing device and phone app help COPD patients breathe easier?