Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

New endoscopic method aims to make rectal polyp removal faster and cheaper

NCT ID NCT07236827

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study tests a new endoscopic technique called ESISD for removing large, flat precancerous growths in the rectum. It compares ESISD to the standard procedure (ESD) in 60 patients to see if it is faster, safer, and more cost-effective. The goal is to improve treatment for patients with these rectal polyps.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Endoscopic Synchronous Injection and Submucosal Dissection (ESISD) procedure
What this could lead to
If successful, ESISD could offer a faster, safer, and cheaper way to remove large rectal polyps, reducing procedure time and costs.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study with only 60 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The new technique may not be safer or more effective than the standard approach.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 60 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Dec 2025

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Dec 2026

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age ≥ 18 years. 2. Endoscopic diagnosis of a large (≥ 20 mm) granular mixed nodular laterally spreading tumor (LST-G-M) located in the rectum. 3. Lesion situated 0-15 cm from the anal verge. 4. Pre-procedure imaging (e.g., EUS) and endoscopic assessment suggest a very low to low risk of lymph node metastasis (i.e., lesions confined to the mucosa or with superficial submucosal invasion \< 1000 μm). 5. Deemed suitable for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) based on a comprehensive clinical evaluation by the endoscopist. 6. Provision of signed and dated informed consent form. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Coagulopathy that cannot be adequately corrected, including an international normalized ratio (INR) \> 1.5 or a platelet count \< 50,000/μL. 2. Evidence of deep submucosal invasion (≥ 1000 μm) or obvious non-lifting sign, suggesting a need for surgical intervention. 3. Pregnancy or lactation. 4. Inability to tolerate deep sedation or general anesthesia. 5. History of colorectal surgery (except for simple appendectomy or polypectomy). 6. Presence of a synchronous colorectal cancer that requires priority treatment. 7. Recurrent lesions at the same site. 8. Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, could increase the patient's risk or interfere with the study assessments.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Endoscopic resection are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  2. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.