Updated cardiac arrest guidelines may boost survival, study hints
NCT ID NCT07649889
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study reviewed records of 630 adults who survived a cardiac arrest and were treated in an ICU in Italy over 14 years. Researchers compared outcomes across three time periods when different official treatment guidelines were in use. The goal was to see if newer guidelines led to more people surviving and recovering brain function.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could show that following updated guidelines improves survival and brain function after cardiac arrest.
- What could go wrong
- This is an observational study, not a controlled trial, so it cannot prove cause and effect. Results may be influenced by other changes in care over time.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
630 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Mar 2025
- Finished
-
Oct 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Patients will be selected from the clinical records of the General Intensive Care Unit (ICU1) of S. Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy, the main teaching hospital of the Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata del Trentino (ASUIT). S. Chiara Hospital serves as the primary referral center for critical care in the Trentino region and operates in close collaboration with Trentino Emergenza, the regional emergency medical service. Data will be retrieved from the hospital's digitized clinical records system, which is validated on an hourly basis by ward clinical staff, ensuring high data quality and completeness. The study covers a 14-year period (January 2011- December 2024), spanning three successive ERC-ESICM guideline eras. All data will be anonymized.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
INCLUSION CRITERIA: * Resuscitated from cardiac arrest and subsequently admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) * Age ≥18 years at the time of ICU admission * Out-of-hospital or in-hospital cardiac arrest * Cardiac arrest of any etiology, including cardiac, respiratory, metabolic, toxicological, and traumatic causes Exclusion Criteria: * Age \<18 years at the time of ICU admission (pediatric patients) * Not admitted to ICU
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Cardiac arrest (CA) are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Santa Chiara Hospital
Trento, Italy, 38122, Italy
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a forehead sensor save brains after cardiac arrest?
- The heart rhythm threat hiding in heart attack wards
- Hand position in CPR: does comfort compromise compression quality?
- Short CPR practice sessions at work may sharpen hospital resuscitation skills
- Front-Back vs. Front-Side: which defibrillator pad placement saves more lives?
- Spinal fluid and blood may reveal how the brain suffers after cardiac arrest