Sciatica sufferers: which therapy eases pain better?
NCT ID NCT07050108
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two physical therapy techniques—neurodynamic mobilization and Mulligan SNAGs—for people with chronic sciatica caused by a disc problem. 66 participants completed the trial at Cairo University. Researchers measured pain intensity, pressure pain threshold, and leg movement range to see which approach worked better.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- physical therapy techniques (neurodynamic mobilization and Mulligan SNAGs)
- What this could lead to
- If one technique proves better, it could offer a more effective non-surgical option for managing chronic sciatica pain.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with no phase designation, so results may not apply to all patients. Both techniques are generally low-risk, but individual responses vary.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
66 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Aug 2025
- Finished
-
Jan 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
35 to 50 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * All the patients diagnosed as lumbar radiculopathy (L5-S1) for at least six months. Diagnosis was confirmed by physical, neurological examination (motor assessment, sensory assessment, reflexes) and radiological assessment (CT or MRI). * All patients has second grade of disc bulge which will detect from T2 axial view of MRI according to Fardon and Milette * All patients has unilateral radiculopathy and pain in the distribution of scaitic nerve. * The age of the patients will range from 35 to 50years . Their body mass index will range between( 22-25) Exclusion Criteria: * Bilateral and multilevel disc prolapse or bilateral radtadiating pain * acute pain (pain less than three months). * Presence of active infection in lumbar spine. * Any other spinal deformities. * Postoperative cases. * Cauda equine lesion. * Neoplasmic. * Spinal stenosis. * Mechanical low back pain. * Failed back syndrome.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Discogenic pain are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Faculty of physical therapy, Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Arabic back pain survey put to the test
- Can one injection beat back pain? a trial aims to find out
- Can a simple tape boost sciatica recovery and balance?
- Shockwave or ultrasound? trial aims to settle which therapy eases sciatica pain and improves sleep
- Hidden clues on CT: three signs that may pinpoint the nerve behind sciatica pain
- Disc replacement may keep patients working longer than spinal fusion