Neck pain relief: which therapy works better?
NCT ID NCT07331571
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at two hands-on therapies for people with long-term neck pain (at least 3 months). Forty-four adults received either myofascial release alone or combined with a muscle energy technique over 6 weeks. Researchers measured pain, neck disability, and range of motion to see which approach offered more relief.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- myofascial release therapy and autogenic inhibition muscle energy technique
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could point toward a more effective physical therapy approach for easing chronic neck pain and improving neck movement.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with only 44 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The interventions are manual therapies, not drugs, so benefits are likely modest.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
44 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jan 2025
- Finished
-
Oct 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
20 to 45 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Neck pain for at least 3 months * Pain intensity on NPRS between 4 to 7 * Limited neck range of motion * Use of computer for at least 2 hours daily * Negative Sharp-Purser and alar ligaments test (to rule out atlantoaxial instability, integrity of transverse and alar ligaments) Exclusion Criteria: * History of trauma * Cervical spine fracture * Open neck surgery * Cervical radiculopathy * Paresthesia * Cervical myelopathy * Rheumatoid Arthritis * Ankylosing Spondylitis * Multiple Sclerosis * Fibromyalgia * Hemorrhage tendency and/or anticoagulation treatment * Whiplash Injury
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Non specific chronic neck pain are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Rehab Max Physio & Sports Injury Clinic
Layyah, Punjab Province, 31200, Pakistan
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Hands-On battle: which manual therapy eases chronic neck pain best?
- Neck pain relief: simple exercises show promise in new study
- AI takes on neck pain: could a smart app replace your physical therapist?
- Neck pain showdown: which therapy works better?
- Simple relaxation exercises may soothe stubborn neck pain