Heart monitoring breakthrough: 14 days vs. 24 hours for MVP patients
NCT ID NCT06378996
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jul 22, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study tests whether wearing a heart monitor for 14 days can detect dangerous heart rhythms in people with mitral valve prolapse (a common heart valve condition) better than the usual 24-hour test. About 60 adults with MVP will wear a patch monitor for two weeks. The goal is to see how often risky rhythms occur and how much they vary day-to-day, which could lead to better detection and future research.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
60 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
May 2024
- Finished
-
Jun 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged 18 years or older * Mitral valve prolapse diagnosed on previous echocardiography or cardiac MRI * New York Heart association classification ≥3 for cohort 3 and classification 1 or 2 for cohorts 1 and 2 * Willing and able to provide signed written informed consent * No contra-indication for long-term monitoring (known allergy to adhesives) Exclusion Criteria: * Prior cardiac surgery, including previous mitral valve intervention * Prior endovascular mitral valve repair (MitraClip) * Previous catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias * Patients not in sinus rhythm * Patients on anti-arrhythmic drugs but betablockers * Known alternative arrhythmic substrate, for example previous myocardial infarction * Known allergy to adhesives
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Mitral valve prolapse are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
UZ Leuven
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, 3000, Belgium
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Armband heart tracker takes on holter monitors
- Can imaging and monitoring unlock the hidden dangers of mitral valve prolapse?
- Heart scans may unlock hidden risks in minority communities
- Could a short course of steroids calm a dangerous heart rhythm?
- Heart valve repair showdown: which surgery works best?
- Can MRI predict dangerous heart rhythms in mitral valve prolapse?