Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Which Back-Pain fix works best? new study pits two manipulation techniques Head-to-Head

NCT ID NCT07258537

Symptom relief Sponsor: University of Lahore Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only This study
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tests two manual therapy techniques—modified Sims manipulation and lumbar roll manipulation—in 60 adults with sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Participants will receive one of the two treatments, and researchers will measure changes in pain, quality of life, and well-being. The goal is to find which approach offers better relief for this common cause of chronic low back pain.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
manual therapy (modified Sims manipulation and lumbar roll manipulation)
What this could lead to
If one technique proves better, it could offer a simple, drug-free option for managing chronic low back pain from the sacroiliac joint.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study with only 60 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The therapies are manual and effects can vary.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 60 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Aug 2024

Expected to finish

Dec 2025

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Age 19-50 Either gender Chronic LBP \>1 month 3 or more positive SIJ provocation/motion tests NPRS ≥3 at baseline Exclusion Criteria: Pelvic fracture MRI-confirmed nerve root compression Psoriatic/Reactive Arthritis Elevated ESR/CRP Neurological signs Severe pain (NPRS \>8) Other red flags (malignancy, fever, etc.) \-

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Sacroiliac joint dysfunction are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Sacroiliac joint dysfunction

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Rasool Medical Complex

    Gujrat, Punjab Province, 52000, Pakistan

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.