Gentler gum cleaning may help reverse early recession
NCT ID NCT06044727
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study tested whether a gentler, magnified cleaning method (MINST) works better than standard deep cleaning for treating early gum recession. Fifty-four adults with shallow gum recession (3 mm or less) took part. The goal was to see if MINST could reduce recession depth and width and improve root coverage more than the usual approach.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Minimally invasive non-surgical periodontal therapy (MINST) using magnifying loupes
- What this could lead to
- If MINST works better, it could offer a less painful, more effective way to treat early gum recession without surgery.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with only 54 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The improvement may be small and not last long-term.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
54 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Sep 2023
- Finished
-
Mar 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
20 to 50 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Gingival Recession Type 1(RT1) by Cairo et al 2011in esthetic zone including maxillary and mandibular anteriors and premolars, otherwise systemically healthy 2. Gingival Recession ≤3mm associated with plaque induced inflammation and identifiable CEJ 3. Age 20 years to 50 years 4. Providing a written and verbal informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patient with systemic disease that can influence the outcome of therapy. 2. Pregnant females or on oral contraceptive pills or hormone replacement therapy. 3. Smokers and patients undergoing orthodontic therapy 4. Physically and mentally impaired patients. 5. Non vital, mal-positioned tooth 6. Presence of cervical abrasions or restorations in the area 7. Previous history of periodontal surgery on the involved sites.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Gingival recession are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences
Rohtak, Haryana, 124001, India
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Gum graft surgery: does the bed matter for thin gums?
- Boosting gum grafts: do blood or gel Add-Ons reduce shrinkage?
- Can a new flap technique better cover receding gums?
- A new twist on gum surgery could better cover exposed roots
- Gum graft boost: growth factors may strengthen receding gum repair
- Micro-needling vs. gum graft: a tiny trial tests a simpler fix for receding gums