Smaller incision, faster recovery? new study tests heart valve surgery approaches
NCT ID NCT07251660
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two types of heart valve surgery: a newer, less invasive method through a small cut on the right side of the chest versus the traditional method through a cut down the middle of the chest. Researchers will measure how quickly patients recover, including time on a breathing machine, pain levels, and wound healing. The goal is to see if the less invasive approach leads to a smoother and faster recovery for patients in Pakistan.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 32 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Dec 2025
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Aug 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
A government agency
The lead sponsor is a government body.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients of any age and gender. * Undergoing elective, isolated mitral or aortic valve surgery. * Considered suitable for either: * MIVS via right thoracotomy, or * Conventional valve surgery , as decided by the operating surgical team. * Patients giving written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Emergency or redo cardiac surgeries * Concomitant cardiac procedures (e.g., CABG, multiple valve replacements) * Ejection Fraction \<30% * Severe pulmonary hypertension (identified as the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) exceeding 45 mmHg on echocardiography, as outlined by the AHA guidelines(10). * Active systemic infections or sepsis at the time of surgery * Refusal to participate in the study
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Aortic valve insufficiency are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can aggressive blood pressure treatment slow aortic valve disease?
- Why do animal heart valves wear out? immune system under investigation
- One scan to rule them all? new CT aims to replace multiple heart tests
- Can a tiny implant fix a leaky heart valve without open surgery?
- Which heart valve design wins for small aortic openings?
- Can a less invasive valve replacement tame a failing aortic valve?