Smaller incision, same goal: mini surgery for kidney stones tested
NCT ID NCT07464717
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compared two types of surgery for kidney stones: mini-PCNL (using a smaller tube) and standard PCNL (using a larger tube). Sixty adults with a single stone smaller than 30 mm took part. Researchers measured surgery time, how well stones were removed, blood loss, fever, and hospital stay. The goal was to see if the mini approach causes fewer complications.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (standard PCNL) procedures
- What this could lead to
- If mini-PCNL works better, it could mean less bleeding and shorter hospital stays for people with kidney stones.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with only 60 people, so results may not apply to everyone. The benefits of mini-PCNL over standard PCNL are still uncertain.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
60 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Aug 2025
- Finished
-
Dec 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
20 to 60 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Eligibility Criteria Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients aged 20 to 60 years 2. Both male and female participants 3. Single renal pelvic stone less than 30 mm in size 4. Diagnosis confirmed by intravenous urography and ultrasonography Exclusion Criteria: 1. Coagulopathy (INR \> 1.5) 2. Active urinary tract infection 3. Staghorn calculus 4. Renal structural anomalies 5. Polycystic kidney disease 6. Ectopic or transplanted kidney 7. Renal malignancy 8. Uncontrolled pyonephrosis 9. Chronic renal failure or chronic liver disease
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Renal stones are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Khyber Teaching Hospital Peshawar
Peshawar, KhyberPakhtunkhwa, 25000, Pakistan
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Kidney stone surgery without the stent: a new study asks if It's safe
- Can a simple tool predict who will be Stone-Free after kidney surgery?
- Which kidney stone technique leaves no stone behind?
- Which surgery is safer for a single kidney with stones? a Head-to-Head trial
- New combo therapy may simplify kidney stone removal
- Kidney stone patients may skip stent after surgery, study hints